2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the accuracy of the corpuscular fragility and mean corpuscular volume tests for the alpha‐thalassemia 1 and beta‐thalassemia traits

Abstract: Both tests have high screening sensitivity for the alpha-thalassemia 1 and/or beta-thalassemia traits, and their simplicity and very low cost make them attractive as screening tests for large populations. Since MCV seems to provide fewer false-positive results, it may be the first choice wherever an automated hematology analyzer calculating MCV is available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only have MCV and MCH values been shown to be highly inaccurate predictors of parental genotype, but also multiple cut off points (between 70–80 for MCV and 20–30 for MCH) have been reported 12. This mandates the development of more accurate indices and formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only have MCV and MCH values been shown to be highly inaccurate predictors of parental genotype, but also multiple cut off points (between 70–80 for MCV and 20–30 for MCH) have been reported 12. This mandates the development of more accurate indices and formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, HbA2 determination plays a very important role in screening programs for βTT, since increased HbA2 level is one of the most typical markers for βTT. Consequently, many laboratories have used a normal or an increased red blood cell (RBC) count, decreased hemoglobin (Hb), microcytic indices and elevated HbA2 level as a diagnosis method for βTT (Kneifati-Hayek et al 2007;Sirichotiyakul et al 2009). In addition, other methods have been proposed for βTT diagnosis, such as red blood cell flags (Eivazi-Ziaei et al 2008;Ntaios 2009), microcytic (M)/ hypochromic (H) ratio (Ntaios and Chatzinikolaou 2009a;Urrechaga 2009), red cell distribution width (Harrington et al 2008 ;Ntaios and Chatzinikolaou 2008a), and reticulocytic parameters (Ceylan et al 2007;Ntaios and Chatzinikolaou 2009b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the previous study, MCV had a sensitivity and specificity in predicting alpha‐thalassemia 1 trait at 93.0% and 93.4%, respectively . To gain power of 90% at 95% confidence interval, based on the prevalence of alpha‐thalassemia 1 carrier of 8.5% and error allowance at 0.05, this study would need a sample size of at least 100 cases of alpha‐thalassemia 1 trait.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%