1981
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/14/19/013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of the absorption spectra of the fluorobenzenes and benzene in the region 4.5-9.5 eV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
73
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
11
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-quality fits we achieved are illustrated in Fig. 3, while the so-determined OOSs are listed in Table III along with the results from previous experimental [24][25][26][27][28] and theoretical [36][37][38][39][40][41] investigations. Note that we estimate the uncertainty, again at the one standard deviation level, on our OOSs to be ∼20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The high-quality fits we achieved are illustrated in Fig. 3, while the so-determined OOSs are listed in Table III along with the results from previous experimental [24][25][26][27][28] and theoretical [36][37][38][39][40][41] investigations. Note that we estimate the uncertainty, again at the one standard deviation level, on our OOSs to be ∼20%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…21 Burrow et al 22 determined the vertical electron affinities and characterized the temporary anion states of a series of hydrocarbons including benzene, using electron transmission spectroscopy, while a review of all these resonance studies was provided by Allan. 23 Most experimental studies into excitation of the 1 B 1u and 1 E 1u electronic states have employed either photoabsorption or dipole (e,e ) techniques, [24][25][26][27][28] in order to determine their respective optical oscillator strengths (OOSs). Agreement between the various OOS measurements for the 1 E 1u state is typically very good to the ±5% level, however, for the 1 B 1u state there is a serious disagreement between the results of Feng et al 24 , and Suto et al 25 on the one hand, and those of Philis et al, 26 Pantos et al 27 and Hammond and Price, 28 on the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…47 These differences suggest that the nature of the lowest excited singlet state may be different for the two classes of the compounds, despite the previous ππ* assignment of S 1 for all fluorinated benzenes. 42,44 More specifically, it is possible that the 1 πσ* state, which is formed by the promotion of an electron from the ring-centered π orbital to the σ* orbital, localized on the C-F bond, could be the emitting state in molecules with high degrees of fluorination (i.e., n ) 5, 6). Figure 12 presents the TDDFT vertical excitation energies for the lowest-energy 1 ππ* and 1 πσ* states at optimized ground-state geometry.…”
Section: Fluorinated Benzenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This excited state is the 1 pp* (1 1 B 2 ) state which has been well-documented in the halobenzenes through nanosecond UV (1+1) REMPI experiments around 266 nm. [22][23][24] The monohalobenzenes all follow (m+n) REMPI patterns. At the highest intensities used, the parent ion yields of all five species rapidly decrease as other processes become dominant, such as multiple ionization and fragmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%