2020
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1720921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of temporal processing and spectral processing abilities of monolingual, bilingual and multilingual children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure used for measuring speech perception in noise in the present study was similar to our earlier investigations [Nambi et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2020Kumar et al, , 2021. Speech perception in noise ability was assessed by measuring speech reception threshold in noise.…”
Section: Speech Perception In Noisementioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The procedure used for measuring speech perception in noise in the present study was similar to our earlier investigations [Nambi et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2020Kumar et al, , 2021. Speech perception in noise ability was assessed by measuring speech reception threshold in noise.…”
Section: Speech Perception In Noisementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The spectral processing and speech perception in noise abilities were evaluated by measuring spectral ripple discrimination threshold (SRDT) and speech recognition threshold in noise. The procedure used to measure GDT, amplitude-modulation detection threshold, SRDT, and speech recognition threshold in noise was same as described in earlier investigations [Nambi et al, 2016;Kumar et al, 2020Kumar et al, , 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Language mixing or code-switching may also aid language outcomes (Kaushanskaya & Crespo, 2019). For example, this may correlate with improved word recognition (Morini & Newman, 2019), audio processing skills (Kumar et al, 2020), pronunciation and spelling (Kremin et al, 2019), ability to adapt communication patterns based on how it is received (Gampe et al, 2019), and stronger executive functions in terms of cognitive inhibition and flexibility (Nayak, 2017).…”
Section: Immigrant Demographics and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SiN differences between bilingual and monolingual listeners are most prominent when speech stimuli contain supporting linguistic context, such as (morpho)syntactic structure or semantic content (Bradlow & Alexander, 2007;Skoe & Karayanidi, 2019). In addition, fewer auditory advantages have been found for monolinguals when nonlinguistic auditory domains such as spectral or temporal processing are tested (Kumar et al, 2020;Onoda et al, 2006;Sanayi et al, 2013); more often, bilinguals outperform monolinguals in nonlinguistic auditory tasks. Together, these findings suggest that SiN difficulties experienced by some NNE bilinguals are likely not auditory in nature, but rather result from differences in linguistic and cognitive processes, which may also be susceptible to age-related declines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%