2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-005-0090-6
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
232
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(253 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
232
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the potential inflation of density estimates due to fish being drawn from outside visible sampling areas, unknown areas of attraction as a byproduct of variable bait plume dispersion, alteration of fish behaviors, competitive exclusion, and/or preferential sampling of predator and scavenger populations with corresponding reductions to other functional groups (Harvey et al, 2007;Colton and Swearer, 2010;Dorman et al, 2012). However, comparisons between baited and unbaited camera stations have shown that while carnivore and scavenger abundances tend to increase in the presence of bait, no commensurate changes are typically detected in herbivore or omnivore abundances (Watson et al, 2005;Harvey et al, 2007). The lack of bait-induced declines among non-carnivorous functional groups could be explained by possible "sheep effects, " whereby species not directly attracted to bait plumes are attracted to the feeding activities of others around BRUVS, or conspecific social attraction behaviors (Watson et al, 2005(Watson et al, , 2010Harvey et al, 2007;Dorman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These include the potential inflation of density estimates due to fish being drawn from outside visible sampling areas, unknown areas of attraction as a byproduct of variable bait plume dispersion, alteration of fish behaviors, competitive exclusion, and/or preferential sampling of predator and scavenger populations with corresponding reductions to other functional groups (Harvey et al, 2007;Colton and Swearer, 2010;Dorman et al, 2012). However, comparisons between baited and unbaited camera stations have shown that while carnivore and scavenger abundances tend to increase in the presence of bait, no commensurate changes are typically detected in herbivore or omnivore abundances (Watson et al, 2005;Harvey et al, 2007). The lack of bait-induced declines among non-carnivorous functional groups could be explained by possible "sheep effects, " whereby species not directly attracted to bait plumes are attracted to the feeding activities of others around BRUVS, or conspecific social attraction behaviors (Watson et al, 2005(Watson et al, , 2010Harvey et al, 2007;Dorman et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparisons between baited and unbaited camera stations have shown that while carnivore and scavenger abundances tend to increase in the presence of bait, no commensurate changes are typically detected in herbivore or omnivore abundances (Watson et al, 2005;Harvey et al, 2007). The lack of bait-induced declines among non-carnivorous functional groups could be explained by possible "sheep effects, " whereby species not directly attracted to bait plumes are attracted to the feeding activities of others around BRUVS, or conspecific social attraction behaviors (Watson et al, 2005(Watson et al, , 2010Harvey et al, 2007;Dorman et al, 2012). Finally, underwater sampling visibility was, in general, much higher than the required BRUVS sampling minimum (7 m), even in mesophotic depths to 100 m. While the authors detected no depth-associated, functional group or species-level behavior alterations as a result of reduced light attenuation in deeper strata, coral reef fishes are known to exhibit behavioral shifts in response to varying light levels, which merits additional consideration for future mesophotic research (Rickel and Genin, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The monitoring by underwater video has been demonstrated as an effi cient and non-destructive tool for studying fi sh abundance and behaviour (Fox and Bellwood 2008, Layton and Fulton 2014, Noble et al 2014, Pink and Fulton 2015. Different video systems exist such as baited remote underwater video (BRUV) (Watson et al 2005, Cappo et al 2007, Lowry et al 2012, diver operated video (DOV) (Hall andHanlon 2002, Langlois et al 2010), cabled video observatories , and unbaited, remote underwater video (RUV) (Pelletier et al 2012). The latter was used in this study to monitor the diurnal rhythms of two coastal fi sh species in coralligenous habitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity percentage (SIMPER) analyses were used for each sampling method separately to identify which species contributed to differences in fish assemblage structure between the inner and outer side of the marinas. The criterion for considering a species a good discriminator was based on dissimilarity to standard deviation ratios (Diss/SD) close to 1 and percentage contributions >5% (Watson et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%