2021
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00152-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of sunitinib with cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib for treatment of advanced papillary renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
127
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 58 Results from the randomized Phase II SWOG 1500 study (NCT02761057) demonstrated that cabozantinib treatment significantly increased PFS when compared to sunitinib in patients with metastatic papillary RCC (9 months with cabozantinib versus 5.6 months with sunitinib; hazard ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.37–0.97; 1-sided p = 0.019). 59 However, it is highly likely that NCCRCC patients will develop resistance to single-agent cabozantinib, either due to short-term signaling adaptations (e.g., bypass tracks) or longer-term selection of resistance variants (e.g., gatekeeper mutations). Combination studies with cabozantinib need to be considered, and our data suggest that either dasatinib or a MEK inhibitor would be suitable (e.g., cobimetinib, since it is undergoing combination studies in RCC [+azetolizumab, NCT03264066]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 58 Results from the randomized Phase II SWOG 1500 study (NCT02761057) demonstrated that cabozantinib treatment significantly increased PFS when compared to sunitinib in patients with metastatic papillary RCC (9 months with cabozantinib versus 5.6 months with sunitinib; hazard ratio 0.60; 95% confidence interval 0.37–0.97; 1-sided p = 0.019). 59 However, it is highly likely that NCCRCC patients will develop resistance to single-agent cabozantinib, either due to short-term signaling adaptations (e.g., bypass tracks) or longer-term selection of resistance variants (e.g., gatekeeper mutations). Combination studies with cabozantinib need to be considered, and our data suggest that either dasatinib or a MEK inhibitor would be suitable (e.g., cobimetinib, since it is undergoing combination studies in RCC [+azetolizumab, NCT03264066]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This data was presented at the 2021 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium and concurrently published. 15,16 PFS was the primary endpoint. Initially, patients were randomized to one of four arms: cabozantinib, crizotinib, savolitinib, or Canil et al sunitinib.…”
Section: Non-clear-cell Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two exceptions are the late addition of data from the CLEAR and PAPMET studies, which were presented at the ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium on February 13, 2021 and concurrently published. [13][14][15][16] The results of these trials were reviewed by all co-authors and there was agreement to include the findings in this publication to ensure the most contemporary document and recommendations possible. As new data become available, treatment options will invariably change, and members of the KCRNC intend to update these recommendations on a regular basis moving forward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final results of the SWOG-1500 phase II trial (also known as PAPMET) have been recently presented by Pal and colleagues at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Genito-urinary (ASCO GU) Cancers Symposium 2021 [92]. In this study, the clinical activity of the current standard-of-care sunitinib was compared to multi-kinase inhibitors cabozantinib, crizotinib, and savolitinib in 152 patients with metastatic pRCC (up to one prior systemic therapy was permitted).…”
Section: Met Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other side, the enrollment in the other two arms of savolitinib and crizotinib was stopped in advance on the basis of a preplanned futility analysis. These findings suggested a key role of both VEGF-and MET-signaling pathways in pRCC's oncogenesis, thereby explaining its higher responsiveness to a dual VEGF/MET inhibitor such as cabozantinib than to more selective MET inhibitors as crizotinib or savolitinib [92]. Therefore, cabozantinib may be considered as a novel practice changing strategy for metastatic pRCC patients (Table 2).…”
Section: Met Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%