1998
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199803193381203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Sucralfate and Ranitidine for the Prevention of Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation

Abstract: Among critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation, those receiving ranitidine had a significantly lower rate of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding than those treated with sucralfate. There were no significant differences in the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia, the duration of the stay in the ICU, or mortality.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
298
3
16

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 656 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
298
3
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in a recent multicentre, randomised study of 1200 patients, no significant difference in VAP rates, ICU stay or mortality could be demonstrated, although there was a trend towards lower VAP rates with sucralfate. The ranitidine group had lower rates of clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding than the sucralfate group (1.7% vs. 3.8%) [79]. These conflicting data make recommendations difficult.…”
Section: Gastric Alkalinisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a recent multicentre, randomised study of 1200 patients, no significant difference in VAP rates, ICU stay or mortality could be demonstrated, although there was a trend towards lower VAP rates with sucralfate. The ranitidine group had lower rates of clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding than the sucralfate group (1.7% vs. 3.8%) [79]. These conflicting data make recommendations difficult.…”
Section: Gastric Alkalinisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In intensive care units (ICU), predisposing conditions for stress-related mucosal disease are prolonged mechanical ventilation, coagulopathy, shock, major trauma, surgery, or burn, and multiple organ failure [3,4]. However, randomized trials have suggested that only the first two entities might be relevant, as in their absence the incidence of clinical significant bleeding is less than 0.1% [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians worry about bleeding because historical studies have reported a strong association with mortality [5,6]. However, even when acid-suppressive drugs have shown a reduction in episodes of clinically significant bleeding, this has not translated into a reduction in mortality [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians worry about bleeding because historical studies have reported a strong association with mortality [5,6]. However, even when acid-suppressive drugs have shown a reduction in episodes of clinically significant bleeding, this has not translated into a reduction in mortality [5,6]. These results suggest that bleeding simply identifies patients at greater risk of dying and, when treated, bleeding per se does not cause death [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%