2016
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-2256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Strategies for Retinopathy of Prematurity Detection

Abstract: for the e-ROP Study Cooperative Group abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Delayed detection of type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) can lead to permanent visual impairment. Providing ROP examinations is challenging because of the limited ophthalmology workforce. This study compares digital imaging-based ROP detection strategies versus serial ROP examinations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adverse events were more likely to occur when the infant was on mechanical ventilation, regardless of whether the procedure was an eye examination or retinal imaging. Noteworthy clinical findings such as apnea greater than 10 seconds and severe bradycardia or tachypnea were more common than adverse events and the proportion was consistent with other smaller studies on fragile extremely premature infants (Wade et al, 2015) Based on the findings of the e-ROP study, e-ROP investigators (Kemper et al, 2016) compared digital imaging strategies with bedside serial examinations. Using a microsimulation approach of a cohort of infants with gestational ages from 23-30 weeks GA (microsimulation being a technique to evaluate the outcomes from competing policies by statistically modeling the experience of individuals within a hypothetical cohort), they reported that all cases of type 1 ROP were detected using digital imaging in combination with an ROP examination at discharge.…”
Section: Telemedicine and Rop Screeningsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Adverse events were more likely to occur when the infant was on mechanical ventilation, regardless of whether the procedure was an eye examination or retinal imaging. Noteworthy clinical findings such as apnea greater than 10 seconds and severe bradycardia or tachypnea were more common than adverse events and the proportion was consistent with other smaller studies on fragile extremely premature infants (Wade et al, 2015) Based on the findings of the e-ROP study, e-ROP investigators (Kemper et al, 2016) compared digital imaging strategies with bedside serial examinations. Using a microsimulation approach of a cohort of infants with gestational ages from 23-30 weeks GA (microsimulation being a technique to evaluate the outcomes from competing policies by statistically modeling the experience of individuals within a hypothetical cohort), they reported that all cases of type 1 ROP were detected using digital imaging in combination with an ROP examination at discharge.…”
Section: Telemedicine and Rop Screeningsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In the CRYO-ROP study, experts disagreed on the presence or absence of threshold disease for 12% of the cases, particularly regarding the presence or absence of plus disease 27. While standard retinal examinations are performed by indirect ophthalmoscopy, digital imaging is being increasingly employed, either at the same time (to serve as a permanent record) or alone (to be interpreted locally or remotely) 28. Nonetheless, digital photographs still require interpretation and may be subject to bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few key barriers that hinder direct examination by ophthalmoscopy are decentralization of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), low reimbursement, and high ROP malpractice awards. 7,8 In 2015, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Ophthalmology released a joint systematic review of the tele-ROP literature. The 11 studies ultimately reviewed featured independent masked comparison of a cohort of subjects examined with both wide-angle digital retinal photography and reference standard ophthalmoscopic examination.…”
Section: Hospital-based Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%