Aggregating Dialectology, Typology, and Register Analysis 2014
DOI: 10.1515/9783110317558.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of statistical methods for the aggregation of regional linguistic variation

Abstract: This paper compares two statistical approaches to the analysis of aggregated regional linguistic variation. In the standard approach to dialectometry, common patterns of regional variation are identified by analyzing the distance between a set of locations based on the values of a set of linguistic variables using statistics such as multivariate scaling.Alternatively, in a multivariate spatial analysis, common patterns of regional variation are identified by using a factor analysis to analyze correlations betw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the syntactic distances have been computed for all survey site pairs in the dataset, it is then possible to compute the correlation between the linguistic and the geographic distances over all survey site pairs. We use three correlation measures: two measures of linear correlation—the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and the distance-oriented Mantel test (Mantel, 1967), following Scherrer (2012), Haynie (2012), and Grieve (2014)— and logarithmic correlation. Furthermore, regression models of different types (linear, logarithmic) are fitted to the distributions of syntactic distance against geographic distance, separately for each type of geographic distance measure used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once the syntactic distances have been computed for all survey site pairs in the dataset, it is then possible to compute the correlation between the linguistic and the geographic distances over all survey site pairs. We use three correlation measures: two measures of linear correlation—the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and the distance-oriented Mantel test (Mantel, 1967), following Scherrer (2012), Haynie (2012), and Grieve (2014)— and logarithmic correlation. Furthermore, regression models of different types (linear, logarithmic) are fitted to the distributions of syntactic distance against geographic distance, separately for each type of geographic distance measure used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use three correlation measures: two measures of linear correlationthe Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient and the distance-oriented Mantel test (Mantel, 1967), similarly to Scherrer (2012), Haynie (2012) and Grieve (2014)-and logarithmic correlation. Furthermore, regression models of different types (linear, logarithmic) are fitted to the distributions of syntactic distance against geographic distance, separately for each type of geographic distance measure used.…”
Section: Correlation Of Syntactic and Geographic Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to measures of global spatial autocorrelation, which return a single-value z score for each variable (indicating the degree of regional clustering across the entire distribution of that variable), measures of local spatial autocorrelation produce one value for each location for each variable, indicating the degree to which that particular location is part of a hot spot or cold spot [ 37 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, novel visualization and data analysis techniques from spatial statistics were introduced, such as hierarchical clustering (Goebl 1984), multi-dimensional scaling (Embleton 1993), and correlation analysis (Heeringa & Nerbonne 2001;Goebl 2005). For a comparative review of methods used in dialectometry, see Grieve (2014) and Wieling & Nerbonne (2015). Kelle (2001) provides the first dialectometric account of German-speaking Switzerland.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%