2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35542-4_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Statistical Machine Learning Methods in Heartbeat Detection and Classification

Abstract: PrefaceThe arrival of the so-called Petabyte Age has compelled the analytics community to pay serious attention to development of scalable algorithms for intelligent data analysis. In June 2008, Wired magazine featured a special section on "The Petabyte Age" and stated that "..our ability to capture, warehouse, and understand massive amounts of data is changing science, medicine, business, and technology." The recent explosion in social computing has added to the vastly growing amounts of data from which insig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adhering to common practice in heartbeat classification, we used performance indices metrics for accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Se), positive predictive value (PPV) and false positive ratio (FPR). It is observed in Table 1 that our algorithm gives competent results for sampling rate of 360 Hz in comparison to state-of-the-art results obtained in [2], while also providing discriminatory results at 114 Hz as compared to those of [7], thereby achieving the dual goal of compression and accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Adhering to common practice in heartbeat classification, we used performance indices metrics for accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Se), positive predictive value (PPV) and false positive ratio (FPR). It is observed in Table 1 that our algorithm gives competent results for sampling rate of 360 Hz in comparison to state-of-the-art results obtained in [2], while also providing discriminatory results at 114 Hz as compared to those of [7], thereby achieving the dual goal of compression and accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Alvarado et al [13] in a departure from traditional approaches used pulse based representations of signals using time based samplers such as Integrate and Fire (IF) model [13]. In [14], we compared the performance of LDA, QDA and artificial neural networks (ANN) in detecting Ventricular ectopic Beats (VEB). In [15], we focused on detecting Supraventricular ectopic Beats (SVEB) and proposed a classification technique based on the variations in the ECG morphology of SVEBs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%