2017
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14020146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Spatio-Temporal Disease Mapping Approaches Including an Application to Ischaemic Heart Disease in New South Wales, Australia

Abstract: The field of spatio-temporal modelling has witnessed a recent surge as a result of developments in computational power and increased data collection. These developments allow analysts to model the evolution of health outcomes in both space and time simultaneously. This paper models the trends in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in New South Wales, Australia over an eight-year period between 2006 and 2013. A number of spatio-temporal models are considered, and we propose a novel method for determining the goodness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For examples, a separate Besag-York-Mollie model can be fit at each time point (Knorr-Held & Besag, 1998;Waller et al, 1997), or a CAR model can be combined with a random walk in time (Knorr-Held & Besag, 1998), a spline-based temporal structure (MacNab & Dean, 2001) or a local autoregressive model in time (Congdon & Southall, 2005). For a thorough review and comparison of existing spatio-temporal models, see the work of Anderson and Ryan (2017). A county-by-county exploratory analysis of our Lyme disease data suggests that a first-order autoregressive (AR(1)) model is sufficient for handling temporal dependence.…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For examples, a separate Besag-York-Mollie model can be fit at each time point (Knorr-Held & Besag, 1998;Waller et al, 1997), or a CAR model can be combined with a random walk in time (Knorr-Held & Besag, 1998), a spline-based temporal structure (MacNab & Dean, 2001) or a local autoregressive model in time (Congdon & Southall, 2005). For a thorough review and comparison of existing spatio-temporal models, see the work of Anderson and Ryan (2017). A county-by-county exploratory analysis of our Lyme disease data suggests that a first-order autoregressive (AR(1)) model is sufficient for handling temporal dependence.…”
Section: Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, T ), the latent process has a general form which can be expressed as: X t,i = a i + b t + c t,i , where the terms are indexed according to the components they represent. For example, the specification in Waller et al (1997) is a direct extension of the BYM model to the spatiotemporal case where spatial dependence is modelled separately for each time point so that a i = b t = 0 and c t,i is a sum of spatial (CAR) and independent random effects at time t. In many of these spatiotemporal models (see Anderson & Ryan, 2017, for a review), separate latent variables/random effects are used to capture spatial and temporal dependence.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we consider two model choice criteria that appear to be popular in the literature for areal data models for determining the best model/parameterization from the set of models developed here for any given set of data. Also, as a diagnostic tool to assess the residuals of the best-fitting model, we employ the spatiotemporal version of the Moran's I statistic (see Anderson & Ryan, 2017). These are discussed as follows.…”
Section: Model Choice and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To further investigate the quality of Model 2, we examined the spatio-temporal autocorrelation in the model residuals. A spatio-temporal model with close fit to the data should have low spatio-temporal autocorrelation in its residuals, which is indicative of a good model [49]. For Model 2, we obtained a Moran STI value of 0.009, which implies that there is minimal space-time autocorrelation in the residuals.…”
Section: Model Fitting and Prior Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 77%