1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00292970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of sound propagation and song frequency in temperate marsh and grassland habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an open habitat, one would not expect much restriction in the mode of communication: as long as the vocal communicatory characteristics are adequate for efficient communication, the sparrowweavers survive and reproduce in open habitat, even though a better-developed visual signalling system could be advantageous. Evidence for maximal broadcast distance (Cosens & Falls 1984) could not be found in Whitebrowed Sparrowweavers.…”
Section: If Sparrowweavers Evolved In An Open Habitatmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In an open habitat, one would not expect much restriction in the mode of communication: as long as the vocal communicatory characteristics are adequate for efficient communication, the sparrowweavers survive and reproduce in open habitat, even though a better-developed visual signalling system could be advantageous. Evidence for maximal broadcast distance (Cosens & Falls 1984) could not be found in Whitebrowed Sparrowweavers.…”
Section: If Sparrowweavers Evolved In An Open Habitatmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…EA is generally not linear with distance (COSENS and FALLS 1984;WILEY and RICHARDS 1978), and therefore cannot be treated as an absolute measure of attenuation. Reasons for this are not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propagation effects of vegetation on song transmission and the phenomenon of habitatdependent song variation have been reported especially for forest habitat (Slabbekoorn 2004;Ey and Fischer 2009), but also reed stalks are known to filter selectively and provide better propagation conditions for low than for high song frequencies (Cosens and Falls 1984). An important fact may be that the warble is sung in flight and may be largely free of excess attenuation, but that the trill is predominantly sung perched and may have a transmission pathway to potential receivers through dense vegetation.…”
Section: Song Variation and Climatementioning
confidence: 99%