2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.10.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of sorptive extraction techniques coupled to a new quantitative, sensitive, high throughput GC–MS/MS method for methoxypyrazine analysis in wine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained values of IPMP and IBMP were within the ranges observed by Wen et al [6] using a stir bar sorptive extraction in white, Rosé, and red wines. Interestingly, while the method employed by Wen was able to detect the compounds in pg/L levels,…”
Section: Wine Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained values of IPMP and IBMP were within the ranges observed by Wen et al [6] using a stir bar sorptive extraction in white, Rosé, and red wines. Interestingly, while the method employed by Wen was able to detect the compounds in pg/L levels,…”
Section: Wine Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…SPME requires minimal sampling and the fiber coating can be selected to adsorb compound classes of interest [5]. In the case of the volatile MPs, headspace-SPME (HS-SPME) is ideal for being able to effectively sample and to utilize as a first level of MPs isolation from the other aromatics present [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional SPME-GC-MS analyses of these compounds performed in biological matrices generally report a lower LOD than our current SPMESH-DART-MS/MS method but require longer run times. For example, IBMP can be detected by GC-MS down to low nanogram per liter concentrations, with an oven cycle time (not including sample preparation and extraction) of approximately 30 min; a different group reported an LOD for linalool of low micrograms per liter, with an oven cycle time of approximately 45 min . Because our preliminary work with SPMESH-DART-MS/MS indicated detection limits were likely compromised by high background noise, particularly for linalool (Figure S-3), we investigated if high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) could offer improvements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our laboratory observed carryover of certain methoxypyrazines with the DVB/Car/ PDMS fiber. 25 Perera et al 26 reported significant carryover for a Car/PDMS fiber compared to a PDMS fiber when analyzing wounding compounds of plants with HS-SPME comprehensive two-dimensional GC-MS. Mani 27 explains these reports of carryover with Carboxen-containing fibers by a stronger retention of larger compounds (>12 C atoms) on the fiber, making it difficult to desorb them in a reasonable amount of time in the GC inlet.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%