2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Sonothrombolysis in Aged Clots between Low-Boiling-Point Phase-Change Nanodroplets and Microbubbles of the Same Composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this was achieved using a relatively low PNP of 0.9 MPa (within the FDA safety limit mechanical index = 1.9) compared with higher PNP's of up to 15 MPa as used in other external sonothrombolysis techniques for retracted clots 18 . Previous studies utilizing nanodroplets using high intensity focused ultrasound with PNPs ranging from 2 to 8 MPa were conducted using fresh, unretracted clots, and resulted in percent mass decreases of 25-80% after 30 minutes of treatment 22,24,25 . In this study, we were able to achieve a percent mass decrease of 40% using only 0.9 MPa under similar conditions in retracted clots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, this was achieved using a relatively low PNP of 0.9 MPa (within the FDA safety limit mechanical index = 1.9) compared with higher PNP's of up to 15 MPa as used in other external sonothrombolysis techniques for retracted clots 18 . Previous studies utilizing nanodroplets using high intensity focused ultrasound with PNPs ranging from 2 to 8 MPa were conducted using fresh, unretracted clots, and resulted in percent mass decreases of 25-80% after 30 minutes of treatment 22,24,25 . In this study, we were able to achieve a percent mass decrease of 40% using only 0.9 MPa under similar conditions in retracted clots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the small size of NDs (100-300 nm) compared with MBs (1-10 μm), NDs have the potential to penetrate into retracted clots with low porosity. Upon insonation, these droplets can then form microchannels within the clot and act to both mechanically break down the clot via cavitation effects and allow for greater diffusion of tPA and cavitation effects inside the clots 20,25 .…”
Section: Nanodroplet-mediated Sonothrombolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting bubble, which cavitates in the ultrasound field, likely facilitates tissue dispersion, with the additional advantage of enhanced penetration of tissue while in the liquid nanodroplet precursor stage ( Pajek et al 2014 ). A similar principal has been applied for medical acoustics in which cavitation has been shown to disrupt intravascular blood clots ( Kim et al 2020 ), as well as endothelial and epithelial barriers ( Chen et al 2013 ; Fix et al 2019 ). Depending on the duration of sonication, the degree of chromatin fragmentation in the presence of nanodroplets can be controlled ( Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%