1995
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1995.1034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Some Quadrature Methods for Approximating Cauchy Principal Value Integrals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cauchy principal value is central to many calculations that occur in a wide range of physics and engineering and a number of quadrature strategies have been applied to the problem [14][15][16], such as the FFT [17,18], Euler-MacLaurin [14,[19][20][21], Gaussian [22], Chebyshev [23] and variable transformation [24] (e.g. TANH [25] and Iri-Moriguti-Takasawa [26]) methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cauchy principal value is central to many calculations that occur in a wide range of physics and engineering and a number of quadrature strategies have been applied to the problem [14][15][16], such as the FFT [17,18], Euler-MacLaurin [14,[19][20][21], Gaussian [22], Chebyshev [23] and variable transformation [24] (e.g. TANH [25] and Iri-Moriguti-Takasawa [26]) methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for this interest is probably due to the fact that integral equations with Cauchy principal value integrals have been shown to be an adequate tool [1] for the modeling of many physical situations, such as acoustics, fluid mechanics, elasticity, fracture mechanics, and electromagnetic scattering problems. Numerous work has been devoted in developing efficient quadrature formulas, such as the Gaussian method [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], the Newton-Cotes methods [9][10][11][12][13], spline methods [14,15], and some other methods [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. It is the aim of this paper to investigate the superconvergence phenomenon of trapezoidal rule and, in particular, to derive error estimates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far several numerical methods in approximating the CPV integration have been developed. These methods, which include Gaussian Integration [7], Chebysheusingn polynomial [8], SINC function [9,10], approximation via an Ostrowski type inequality [11] and variable transformation [12][13][14], have been developed. However, they differ significantly from each other with regard to quadrature scheme, complexity, computation accuracy and numerical stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The category of variable transformations includes IMT (Iri-Moriguti-Takasava), TANH (in principle, it is a SINC method), erf function and DE (also called Tanh-Sinh method or double exponential quadrature scheme). A comparison of different quadrature methods can be found in literature [13,14], where the authors used the same set of test problems to compare several important schemes including the Quadpack package, Chebyshev, TANH, IMT, and DE schemes. These schemes show different computation stabilities and complexities from smooth integrands to complex conjugate poles to integrable singularity at boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%