1993
DOI: 10.1016/0922-1425(93)90025-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of some aspects of the U.S. and Japanese equity markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 12-month smoothing is consistent with the four-quarter smoothing in Bloch et al [12]. While EP and BP variables are significant in explaining returns, the majority of the forecast performance is attributable to other model variables, namely the relative earnings-to-price, relative cashto-price, relative sales-to-price, price momentum, and earnings forecast variables.…”
Section: Regression-based Expected Returns Modelingsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The 12-month smoothing is consistent with the four-quarter smoothing in Bloch et al [12]. While EP and BP variables are significant in explaining returns, the majority of the forecast performance is attributable to other model variables, namely the relative earnings-to-price, relative cashto-price, relative sales-to-price, price momentum, and earnings forecast variables.…”
Section: Regression-based Expected Returns Modelingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The Markowitz team used relative variables, defined as the ratio of the absolute fundamental variable ratios divided by the 60-month averages of the fundamental variables. Bloch et al [12] reported a set of ∼200 simulations of United States and Japanese equity models. The models produced outof-sample statistically significant excess returns in the portfolios.…”
Section: Regression-based Expected Returns Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations