1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(99)80014-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of skinfold anthropometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of body fat in cirrhotic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sum of the tricep, bicep, subscapular, and suprailiac skinfolds was used to assess percentage body fat according to previously published age-and sexspecific tables (26). This method has been shown to have comparable results with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with cirrhosis without overt fluid retention (27). Fat-free mass (FFM) was calculated as body weight minus fat mass.…”
Section: Assessment Of Nutritional Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sum of the tricep, bicep, subscapular, and suprailiac skinfolds was used to assess percentage body fat according to previously published age-and sexspecific tables (26). This method has been shown to have comparable results with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with cirrhosis without overt fluid retention (27). Fat-free mass (FFM) was calculated as body weight minus fat mass.…”
Section: Assessment Of Nutritional Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropometric measurements have been proposed as the most practical objective indices of nutritional depletion in chronic liver disease [9] and they are widely used in the nutritional evaluation of patients with cirrhosis [9,[11][12][13][14]. In study III, skinfold thickness at the biceps, subscapular, and suprailiac sites were also measured and percent body fat was calculated [143], a method shown to have comparable results with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in cirrhotics without overt fluid retention [144]. Patients were considered malnourished when triceps skinfold thickness and/or mid-arm muscle circumference were below the 10 th percentile (I) or the 5 th percentile (II,III), according to standard tables for the Swedish population based on age and sex [145], and/or if BMI was < 20 kg·m -2 [146].…”
Section: Nutritional Status Assessment (I II Iii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although anthropometry may be affected by the presence of severe water retention, some studies have shown a good correlation between the assessment of body composition through anthropometric measurements (arm-muscle circumference and triceps skinfold) and more sophisticated techniques such as dual exchange X-ray absorption. 30,31 The arm-muscle circumference and triceps skinfold thickness have also been shown to correlate with mortality in cirrhotic patients. 23,24 To overcome the difficulty to assess the nutritional status in patients with chronic liver disease, some authors have applied a combination of different parameters to obtain what is widely known as the 'Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)' of nutrition.…”
Section: Main Causes Of Malnutrition and Methods To Recognize Nutritimentioning
confidence: 99%