2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-460x(02)01385-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of shell theories for large-amplitude vibrations of circular cylindrical shells: Lagrangian approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
94
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where G 12 , G 13 and G 23 are the shear moduli in the 1-2, 1-3 and 2-3 directions, respectively, and the superscript (k) refers to the kth layer within a laminate. Equation (2.6) is obtained (i) under the transverse isotropy assumption with respect to planes orthogonal to axis 1, i.e.…”
Section: First Step: Natural Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where G 12 , G 13 and G 23 are the shear moduli in the 1-2, 1-3 and 2-3 directions, respectively, and the superscript (k) refers to the kth layer within a laminate. Equation (2.6) is obtained (i) under the transverse isotropy assumption with respect to planes orthogonal to axis 1, i.e.…”
Section: First Step: Natural Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (2.6) is obtained (i) under the transverse isotropy assumption with respect to planes orthogonal to axis 1, i.e. assuming fibres in the direction parallel to axis 1, so that E 2 = E 3 , G 12 = G 13 and ν 12 = ν 13 , and (ii) by solving the constitutive equations for ε 33 as a function of ε 11 and ε 22 and then eliminating it. Equation (2.6) can be transformed to the shell coordinates (x, θ, z) by the following equation [31]:…”
Section: First Step: Natural Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, in-plane inertia is retained in the equations of motions, which are derived via a Lagrangian approach [17][18][19]. In-plane inertia must be retained for shells that cannot be considered shallow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-plane inertia must be retained for shells that cannot be considered shallow. The effect of retaining or neglecting in-plane inertia has been addressed by Amabili [17] for closed circular cylindrical shells, and by Abe et al [20] for curved panels but only in the linear (natural frequencies) part of their study. As a consequence of taking into account these additional degrees-of-freedom, the computation of the LNMs is tedious and is thus bypassed by using as expansion functions an ad hoc basis verifying the boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%