2016 IEEE First International Conference on Control, Measurement and Instrumentation (CMI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cmi.2016.7413790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of several nonlinear filters for ballistic missile tracking on re-entry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of Taylor series expansion, assuming Gaussian distributions, the UKF can achieve at least second‐order accuracy in the face of an arbitrary nonlinear function (Merwe, 2004), while the standard EnKF can achieve at least first‐order accuracy (Luo & Moroz, 2009). Comparison studies in other fields (Gillijns et al., 2006; Gross et al., 2010; Gupta et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2012; H. Liu et al., 2020; Meng et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2016) show that the UKF and CKF are competitive methods for state estimation to the popular PF and EnKF, which achieve a satisfactory compromise between the filter performance and computational efficiency (i.e., good estimation accuracy and stable performance are obtained within moderate computational time). Sun et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of Taylor series expansion, assuming Gaussian distributions, the UKF can achieve at least second‐order accuracy in the face of an arbitrary nonlinear function (Merwe, 2004), while the standard EnKF can achieve at least first‐order accuracy (Luo & Moroz, 2009). Comparison studies in other fields (Gillijns et al., 2006; Gross et al., 2010; Gupta et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2012; H. Liu et al., 2020; Meng et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2016) show that the UKF and CKF are competitive methods for state estimation to the popular PF and EnKF, which achieve a satisfactory compromise between the filter performance and computational efficiency (i.e., good estimation accuracy and stable performance are obtained within moderate computational time). Sun et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison studies in other fields (Gillijns et al, 2006;Gross et al, 2010;Gupta et al, 2015;Kim et al, 2012;H. Liu et al, 2020;Meng et al, 2018;Singh et al, 2016) show that the UKF and CKF are competitive methods for state estimation to the popular PF and EnKF, which achieve a satisfactory compromise between the filter performance and computational efficiency (i.e., good estimation accuracy and stable performance are obtained within moderate computational time). Sun et al (2020) introduced the UKF to improve the forecast performance of a conceptual hydrologic model (Wageningen Lowland Runoff Simulator, WALRUS) by updating the states and comparing the UKF with the stochastic EnKF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found some studies that deal with this subject [3,4]. Comparative studies have been developed to implement more accurate and robust tracking algorithms to solve real problems in this area [5][6][7]. In this study, four different tracking algorithms are researched in terms of performance and computational complexities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%