The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1998
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-55-1-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of several measures of genetic distance and population structure with microsatellite data: bias and sampling variance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason for the low level of allele variation is probably the small sample size (Galbusera et al 1996). Ruzzante (1998) suggested a population size of at least 50 individuals for the study of microsatellite loci. As H. nigricollaris is very rare, we could collect only 21 specimens for the population analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for the low level of allele variation is probably the small sample size (Galbusera et al 1996). Ruzzante (1998) suggested a population size of at least 50 individuals for the study of microsatellite loci. As H. nigricollaris is very rare, we could collect only 21 specimens for the population analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Waples and Gaggiotti (2006) found STRUCTURE to perform poorly when F ST~0 .01. While the number of loci and number of individuals from each population (except Paris) genotyped in this study should provide sufficient power for genetic distance and population structure measures (Ruzzante 1997;Ryman et al 2006), when gene flow is moderate or high, it maybe insufficient for Bayesian assignment methods such as STRUCTURE (Waples and Gaggiotti 2006). This explanation, however, cannot be used to interpret the results of Lippe et al (2006), who genotyped 22 microsatellite loci.…”
Section: Population Genetic Structurementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Overall, increased sampling intensity led to increased precision (i.e., decreased variance) of the estimate. Special attention should be drawn to the datasets of 50 randomly sampled individuals, as this size is most characteristic of sampling effort in the literature (Ruzzante 1998;van Oppen and Gates 2006). Notice that when estimating H O with 50 randomly sampled individuals, while the median value (0.405) of twenty replicate subsets is close to the true value (0.397), there is a large range associated with this sampling intensity (0.35-0.46).…”
Section: Spatial Autocorrelation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%