2018
DOI: 10.1037/pas0000481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of self-report measures of psychopathy among nonforensic samples using item response theory analyses.

Abstract: This study investigated how well components of the psychopathy trait are measured among college students with the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP), the Personality Assessment Inventory–Antisocial Features Scale (PAI ANT), the Psychopathic Personality Inventory–Short Form (PPI-SF), and the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale-II (SRP-II). Using Samejima (1969)’s graded response model (GRM), the subscales were found to vary in their ability to measure the corresponding latent traits. The LSRP primary psych… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary and secondary psychopathy scores demonstrated sufficient internal consistency and substantial between-subject variability ( Table 3). The range of primary and secondary psychopathy scores obtained in the present sample (Table 3) was consistent with previous studies that had similar sample demographics (Prado, Treeby, & Crowe, 2015;Tsang, Salekin, Coffey, & Cox, 2017).…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Primary and secondary psychopathy scores demonstrated sufficient internal consistency and substantial between-subject variability ( Table 3). The range of primary and secondary psychopathy scores obtained in the present sample (Table 3) was consistent with previous studies that had similar sample demographics (Prado, Treeby, & Crowe, 2015;Tsang, Salekin, Coffey, & Cox, 2017).…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Primary and secondary psychopathy scores demonstrated sufficient internal consistency and substantial between-subject variability ( Table 3). The range of primary and secondary psychopathy scores obtained in the present sample (Table 3) was consistent with previous studies that had similar sample demographics (Prado, Treeby, & Crowe, 2015;Tsang, Salekin, Coffey, & Cox, 2017). Table 3.…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Specifically, Levenson et al (1995) formulated three main hypotheses, which were supported by the data: first, that psychopathy scores would be related to antisocial behavior; second, that psychopathy scores would not be related to indexes of fearlessness or adventurousness; and third, that state anxiety would be positively related to secondary psychopathy, but unrelated to primary psychopathy. In more recent studies, the LSRP scales have shown adequate construct validity, as expected for scales aligned to the two factors of the PCL (Miller, Gaughan, & Pryor, 2008;Salekin, Chen, Sellbom, Lester, & MacDougall, 2014;Tsang, Salekin, Coffey, & Cox, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%