Abstract:The study examined the impact of coursework-only assessment, as made necessary at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, adopting a quantitative research approach with 1013 students. The data obtained were analysed using SPSS version 27.0 to obtain descriptive and inferential statistics. The results revealed significant differences between the 2019- and 2020 marks for the same courses. In two of the science courses (T2 and T3), the mean scores for 2019 were significantly higher than the mean scores for 2020. In t… Show more
“…In primary and secondary educational levels examinations was prioritized to examination classes where COVID 19 health protocols must be followed to minimize the spread of the disease [26]. In the case of universities, open book case studies were conducted online with limited time frames of between 4 hours to six hours of exams specifically in South Africa [27]. The author went on to reveal that there was no difference in performance when students wrote examinations under tight control conditions and coursework marks that were considered in the year 2020.…”
Section: Examination Management During Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning
The study investigated educational innovations in universities in South Africa and Zimbabwe respectively using a desktop research design. Only peer reviewed journal articles were considered to solicit data on educational innovations and challenges that these institutions faced and examination management online. Thirty-five articles were originally obtained and were reduced to nineteen after filtering them to relevant themes linked to the topic under consideration. The results showed that most of the universities were not utilizing digital tools available to them, and the usage only accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Internet infrastructure, user capability, data bundle cost, erratic power supply, personal electronic devices and home space were among the challenges that hindered smooth running of online teaching. Examinations were difficult to manage under the uncertain conditions. Universities have a lot of work to do to ensure that migration from face-to-face teaching to online platforms sufficiently, effectively, and efficiently take place.
“…In primary and secondary educational levels examinations was prioritized to examination classes where COVID 19 health protocols must be followed to minimize the spread of the disease [26]. In the case of universities, open book case studies were conducted online with limited time frames of between 4 hours to six hours of exams specifically in South Africa [27]. The author went on to reveal that there was no difference in performance when students wrote examinations under tight control conditions and coursework marks that were considered in the year 2020.…”
Section: Examination Management During Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning
The study investigated educational innovations in universities in South Africa and Zimbabwe respectively using a desktop research design. Only peer reviewed journal articles were considered to solicit data on educational innovations and challenges that these institutions faced and examination management online. Thirty-five articles were originally obtained and were reduced to nineteen after filtering them to relevant themes linked to the topic under consideration. The results showed that most of the universities were not utilizing digital tools available to them, and the usage only accelerated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Internet infrastructure, user capability, data bundle cost, erratic power supply, personal electronic devices and home space were among the challenges that hindered smooth running of online teaching. Examinations were difficult to manage under the uncertain conditions. Universities have a lot of work to do to ensure that migration from face-to-face teaching to online platforms sufficiently, effectively, and efficiently take place.
“…Instead, it would appear that some students have found ways to capitalise on the loopholes in the systems to achieve high performance without necessarily demonstrating learning. 81 Irrespective of the impressive student performance, the extent to which their digital curricular experience prepares them for their future workplace remains questionable. Some universities may see this drawback as a valid reason to return to the pre-pandemic contact mode of teaching, learning, and assessment,that may be justifiable for the purposes of academic integrity.…”
As the COVID-19 pandemic brought the world to a standstill, many traditional contact higher education institutions, such as the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN), embraced the technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) to pursue their mandates. Such transitions necessitate transforming existing curricula into digitised versions that infuse digital technologies into programme delivery and embed digital learning experiences students need to thrive in the 4IR workplace. However, two years into online education, the extent to which the Bachelor of Education (B.Ed) curriculum in the School of Education (SoE) at UKZN integrates digital technologies in programme offerings remain largely uncertain. This article therefore aims to ascertain how the B.Ed curriculum of the SoE has been digitally transformed to support the production of teachers who are prepared for the 4IR classroom. It further explores whether or not the digital curriculum transformation of the B.Ed curriculum deepens the existing digital divide amongst students or builds bridges for digital learning. Stufflebeam’s context, input, process, and product (CIPP) model was relied upon to appreciate students’ digital learning experiences through a qualitative content review of twelve curriculum templates and moderation reports. The findings suggested varied learning experiences of content and digital skills for students who engaged with the digital B.Ed curriculum while pointing to a possible epistemological limitation for some students due the contextual digital divide. Insights from this article will be helpful to academics and the institution in their quest to produce graduates for the 4IR classroom while making a timeous contribution to the scholarship of teaching and learning to enhance sustainable post-COVID-19 pedagogical practices.
Keywords: Digital transformation, 4IR classroom, Digitalised curriculum, Digital divide.
“…In South Africa higher education instructors needed adequate professional development on setting and administering online assessments that test adequate lower-and higher-order cognitive skills to sufficiently assess students' knowledge during online assessments and to ensure the reliability of the assessment outcomes (Mafugu, 2021).…”
Section: Hana: Each Instructor Gives Us the Exam Date One Day Before ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online assessment should test adequate higher-and lower-level cognitive skills for sufficient evaluation of the students' knowledge and skills. A variety of assessment methods and a diversity of tasks must be used to ensure the reliability of the assessment outcomes (Mafugu (2021). To improve assessment of students' learning outcomes in online instruction, this study recommends the following:…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kilickaya (2021) found five major challenges in teacher training programs during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic related to assessment type, assessment item formats, support, previous training (assessment literacy), and academic integrity. In South Africa higher education instructors needed adequate professional development on setting and administering online assessments that test adequate lower-and higher-order cognitive skills to sufficiently assess students' knowledge during online assessments and to ensure the reliability of the assessment outcomes (Mafugu, 2021).…”
At Saudi universities, there was a sudden shift from face-to-face instruction to distance learning and assessment in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. This study explored the status of online exams in language, linguistics, and translation courses in the first two semesters of the Pandemic (Spring 2020 and Fall 2020). Analysis of faculty surveys and students’ comments on Twitter showed that the main concern of 91% of the students was final exams and passing courses with high grades. Students were worried about the negative effect of online exams on their GPA. Since the students were not familiar with online exams taken via Blackboard, they were anxious and wondered if they would do well. Some cheated on online exams as their cameras were turned off. Numerous adjustments were mandated by university administrations to alleviate students’ anxiety such as allocating 20% of the course mark to the final exam, allowing more exam time, giving projects, open-book exams, term papers, reports, assignments or giving a presentation instead of the final. Some instructors gave easy questions and were lenient in grading to avoid students’ complaints. They gave no essay, just objective questions. The students were given the option to drop the course, to choose a letter grade, pass/fail, i.e., no grade, or to have a course mark included in their GPA. Based on faculty surveys, this study reports challenges of online exams during the Pandemic, design and delivery of online exams, assessment forms and choices, grade inflation issues, and lessons learned and some recommendations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.