2008
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181602ae1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Seal in Seven Supraglottic Airway Devices Using a Cadaver Model of Elevated Esophageal Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
59
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
59
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This was shown in both cadaveric studies and in vivo studies. 22,24,25 While the PLMA and SLMA are seldom used electively for patients at risk of aspiration, the above studies suggest that the adequate seal provided will allow drainage of gastric fluid even at high intragastric pressure without increasing the risk of aspiration. This can be achieved when the airway devices are positioned correctly.…”
Section: Slma and Risk Of Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was shown in both cadaveric studies and in vivo studies. 22,24,25 While the PLMA and SLMA are seldom used electively for patients at risk of aspiration, the above studies suggest that the adequate seal provided will allow drainage of gastric fluid even at high intragastric pressure without increasing the risk of aspiration. This can be achieved when the airway devices are positioned correctly.…”
Section: Slma and Risk Of Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esophageal pressure during vomiting or regurgitation was postulated to be 60 to 105 cmH 2 O, although it has not been extensively studied. [24,25] To simulate a more clinically urgent situation in terms of the occurrence of pulmonary aspiration, we used an esophageal pressure of 130 cmH 2 O, which was equal to that used by Bercker et al [26] In summary, prevention of aspiration of gastric contents was diffi cult in the semi-lateral position within clinically relevant ranges when placing the head in the neutral, simple extension, and sniffing positions. The lateral or excessive semi-lateral position was necessary to protect the trachea and lung from aspiration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 While the design of the King LT, specifically the distal esophageal cuff, isolates the stomach more effectively than the laryngeal mask supraglottic airway, 23 pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents is still possible. In our cohort, the incidence of pulmonary aspiration was 2%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%