2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-014-0855-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of scat counts and camera-trapping as means of assessing Iberian lynx abundance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To avoid this problem, we used camera trapping as a supplementary method, since they took photographs when something moved in front them. As in other research papers [58,60], we found similar results using supplementary methods: dung heap count and camera traps.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To avoid this problem, we used camera trapping as a supplementary method, since they took photographs when something moved in front them. As in other research papers [58,60], we found similar results using supplementary methods: dung heap count and camera traps.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Space use by ungulates [3,57,58] and other species [59,60] was assessed using the dung heap count and camera trapping registration methods. The first method is not as expensive as the second, and it provides accurate abundance index of ungulate populations [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil eDNA detected the same small mammals as fecal eDNA, however, did not detect some of the larger mammals that occur at low occupancy in JRBP, including raccoon and muskrat. Also notable, the positive correlation between scats and camera-trap images suggests that scat collection may also be used as an indicator of relative abundance for these species, similar to previous studies on Iberian lynx (Garrote et al, 2014) and jaguar abundance (Sollmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Capturing Biodiversity With Menasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Searching efforts were focused on trails, tracks and paths within each square (Sarmento et al 2009), while lynx behaviour in depositing faeces at the crossroads of trails and paths facilitates this type of search (Robinson and Delibes 1988). This methodology and the sampling effort have proven to be effective in detecting a stable presence of the lynx in other areas, even at low densities (see Guzmán et al 2004;Garrote et al 2014). All scats that were potentially attributable to Iberian lynx were collected for subsequent genetic analysis (see Palomares et al 2002).…”
Section: Scat Surveymentioning
confidence: 98%