2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of sampling methods for seawater microplastics and a first report of the microplastic litter in coastal waters of Ascension and Falkland Islands

Abstract: To date there is no gold standard for sampling microplastics. Zooplankton sampling methods, such as plankton and Neuston nets, are commonly used to estimate the concentrations of microplastics in seawater, but their ability to detect microplastics is limited by their mesh size. We compared different net-based sampling methods with different mesh sizes including bongo nets (>500µm), manta nets (>300µm) and plankton nets (>200µm and >400µm) to 1 litre bottle grabbed, filtered (0.45µm) samples. Concentrations of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, fibers represented only 4% of the total of MP found in our study, after the exclusion of airborne contamination (11%) from the original MP amount. The small abundance of fibers reported here may rely on the retention efficiency of treatment processes of WWTW (Gies et al, 2018) at both Setúbal (advanced secondary treatment) and Sesimbra (tertiary treatment) Municipalities, or be related to the sampling method applied, as neuston nets are suggested to underestimate the concentrations of fibers when compared with other methods (Barrows et al, 2017;Green et al, 2018).…”
Section: Distribution Variations According To Particle Shapementioning
confidence: 85%
“…In fact, fibers represented only 4% of the total of MP found in our study, after the exclusion of airborne contamination (11%) from the original MP amount. The small abundance of fibers reported here may rely on the retention efficiency of treatment processes of WWTW (Gies et al, 2018) at both Setúbal (advanced secondary treatment) and Sesimbra (tertiary treatment) Municipalities, or be related to the sampling method applied, as neuston nets are suggested to underestimate the concentrations of fibers when compared with other methods (Barrows et al, 2017;Green et al, 2018).…”
Section: Distribution Variations According To Particle Shapementioning
confidence: 85%
“…Plastics recorded in water and sediments are typically significantly larger than microplastics recorded in marine biota. These smaller microplastics that go undetected may cause impacts in marine organisms [15] and potentially lead to in human health effects [2]. Counting particles under a microscope has limitations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a study comparing different net-based sampling devices with different mesh sizes including bongo nets (>500 μm), manta nets (>300 μm), and plankton nets (>200 and >400 μm) to filtration of grab samples (0.45 μm) established that MP concentrations using net-based methods were ∼3 orders of magnitude less than those obtained by filtration of 1 L grab samples. 26 Mesh size is a critical point that determines the minimum size and the number of MPs detected. Furthermore, synthetic fibers and particles (as nanoplastics) having dimensions <25 μm easily bypass these devices.…”
Section: Methods Of Sampling and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%