1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(96)00068-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of reserve selection algorithms using data on terrestrial vertebrates in Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
259
2
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
14
259
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although complex, globally optimal approaches have been developed (Csuti et al 1997), we use a simpler heuristic approach owing to the very large number of pixels that are prioritized in our application (~85,000). Here, an initial step consists of summing species' distributions to identify the area of maximum species richness; species occurring in this area are identified, and eliminated from further analysis.…”
Section: Palavrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although complex, globally optimal approaches have been developed (Csuti et al 1997), we use a simpler heuristic approach owing to the very large number of pixels that are prioritized in our application (~85,000). Here, an initial step consists of summing species' distributions to identify the area of maximum species richness; species occurring in this area are identified, and eliminated from further analysis.…”
Section: Palavrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, continuous measures of narrow endemism are often used, such as weighted richness by inverse rangesize, termed rangesize rarity (e.g. Csuti et al,1997), which although dominated by rare species, considers all species (e.g. Williams et al, 1996a).…”
Section: Measuring Species Richness and Narrow Endemismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of these methods to find optimal solutions to the reserve site selection problem include Cocks and Baird (1989), Saetersdal et al (1993), Church et al (1996), Kiester et al (1996), Csuti et al (1997), Pressey et al (1997), Ando et al (1998), Snyder et al (1999), and Polasky et al (2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%