1987
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(19)36283-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of repair and replacement for mitral valve incompetence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
2
3

Year Published

1988
1988
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
27
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In isolated mitral valve surgery, MRep has proven its superiority regarding late survival and event-free survival. 16,17 Third, it is of the utmost importance to know the durability of the MRep in these instances. We can argue that it is better to have a good functioning mitral prosthesis rather than a badly repaired mitral valve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In isolated mitral valve surgery, MRep has proven its superiority regarding late survival and event-free survival. 16,17 Third, it is of the utmost importance to know the durability of the MRep in these instances. We can argue that it is better to have a good functioning mitral prosthesis rather than a badly repaired mitral valve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NYHA class III or IV symptoms are useful markers of left ventricular impairment in severe mitral regurgitation, particularly as the regurgitation masks the decline in left ventricular contractility and ejection fraction. The risk of postoperative myocardial failure is markedly increased by pre-operative NYHA class III or IV symptoms (hazard ratio 6-6) and a left ventricular ejection fraction of <40% (hazard ratio [4][5][6][7][8]. Early surgery before these features appear is essential to optimise outcome.…”
Section: The Need For Early Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever possible, mitral valve repair instead of replacement should be undertaken for treatment of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) 1–3 . For better surgical repair, precise anatomic identification of the prolapsing part (anterior segments and posterior scallops) of the MV is necessary 4–8 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%