2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Radiation Techniques in Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiation for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is no direct comparison of 3D-CRT and IMRT for LA-NSCLC, many retrospective studies have shown the efficacy and safety of IMRT for LA-NSCLC [ 11–13 ]. Based on these back grounds, IMRT for LA-NSCLC is increasingly performed [ 14 ]. Another change in radiotherapy treatment for LA-NSCLC is the use of involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) instead of elective nodal irradiation (ENI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no direct comparison of 3D-CRT and IMRT for LA-NSCLC, many retrospective studies have shown the efficacy and safety of IMRT for LA-NSCLC [ 11–13 ]. Based on these back grounds, IMRT for LA-NSCLC is increasingly performed [ 14 ]. Another change in radiotherapy treatment for LA-NSCLC is the use of involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) instead of elective nodal irradiation (ENI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lung cancer, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) techniques have a significant dosimetric advantage over 3D conformal radiation therapy. [1][2][3][4][5] Several studies have focused on dosimetric differences between IMRT and VMAT plans for lung cancer. [6][7][8] Li et al 9 discovered specific advantages of various IMRT and VMAT strategies for lung cancer in different locations and proposed the application of different planning techniques for lung cancer treatment according to the classification-central or peripheral-and the requirements of the organs at risk (OARs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lung cancer, intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) techniques have a significant dosimetric advantage over 3D conformal radiation therapy. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 Several studies have focused on dosimetric differences between IMRT and VMAT plans for lung cancer. 6 , 7 , 8 Li et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation therapy serves as an important modality for the treatment of NSCLC. Despite major advances in the field of radiotherapy technology during the past decades ( 3 , 4 ), the prognosis for 5-year survival rate in patients with inoperable locally advanced NSCLC is still poor (approximately 12–24%) ( 5 ) due to radioresistance related local recurrence ( 6 ). Increasing radiation dose is an important strategy for overcoming radiation tolerance; however, the risk of normal tissue toxicity always limits the dose escalation ( 7 , 8 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%