2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03041.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia: effects on aortic blood flow velocity and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity*

Abstract: SummaryWe compared systemic (aortic) blood flow and cerebral blood flow velocity in 30 patients randomly allocated to receive either propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia. Cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) was measured in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler. Systemic blood flow velocity (SBFv) was measured in the aorta using transthoracic Doppler sonography at the level of the aortic valve. Bispectral index (BIS) was used to measure the depth of anaesthesia. Measurements were made in the awak… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hemodynamic properties, such as cerebrovascular reactivity for changing CO 2 concentration in blood (20,21), and the infl uence of sevofl urane and propofol on autoregulation of cerebrovascular circulation have been widely analyzed (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). Comparative studies investigating the effect of these anesthetics on CBF velocity were also performed; however, they included only patients without intracranial pathology (3,5,6,19,(22)(23)(24)(25)(29)(30)(31)(32). Thus, to our knowledge, this is the fi rst study comparing effects of sevofl urane and propofol on the cerebral circula- The primary aim of the present randomized clinical investigation was to compare the cerebrovascular effects of sevofl urane and propofol by means of transcranial Doppler measurements under equipotent anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hemodynamic properties, such as cerebrovascular reactivity for changing CO 2 concentration in blood (20,21), and the infl uence of sevofl urane and propofol on autoregulation of cerebrovascular circulation have been widely analyzed (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28). Comparative studies investigating the effect of these anesthetics on CBF velocity were also performed; however, they included only patients without intracranial pathology (3,5,6,19,(22)(23)(24)(25)(29)(30)(31)(32). Thus, to our knowledge, this is the fi rst study comparing effects of sevofl urane and propofol on the cerebral circula- The primary aim of the present randomized clinical investigation was to compare the cerebrovascular effects of sevofl urane and propofol by means of transcranial Doppler measurements under equipotent anesthesia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50-60) compared to most other studies, using a lower ranges (i.e. 40-60) [5] (45-60) [7] or (40-50) [8]. However, further studies are needed to ascertain a particular BIS range for neurosurgical procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Sevo urane has a dominant effect on cerebral oxygen metabolism at a low concentration; while at medium and high concentrations, it has a direct vasodilatory effect [30]. Propofol reduces cerebral blood ow more because of its effect on reducing cerebral oxygen metabolism rather than direct vasoconstriction [31,32]. Meanwhile, the ONSD can re ect intracranial pressure in real time; however, the correlation coe cient between ONSD and intracranial pressure in previous studies was 0.660-0.820 [19,33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%