A comparison of professional-level faculty and student perceptions of active learning: its current use, effectiveness, and barriers

Abstract

Active learning is an instructional method in which students become engaged participants in the classroom through the use of in-class written exercises, games, problem sets, audience-response systems, debates, class discussions, etc. Despite evidence supporting the effectiveness of active learning strategies, minimal adoption of the technique has occurred in many professional programs. The goal of this study was to compare the perceptions of active learning between students who were exposed to active learning in the classroom (n = 116) and professional-level physiology faculty members (n = 9). Faculty members reported a heavy reliance on lectures and minimal use of educational games and activities, whereas students indicated that they learned best via the activities. A majority of faculty members (89%) had observed active learning in the classroom and predicted favorable effects of the method on student performance and motivation. The main reported barriers by faculty members to the adoption of active learning were a lack of necessary class time, a high comfort level with traditional lectures, and insufficient time to develop materials. Students hypothesized similar obstacles for faculty members but also associated many negative qualities with the traditional lecturers. Despite these barriers, a majority of faculty members (78%) were interested in learning more about the alternative teaching strategy. Both faculty members and students indicated that active learning should occupy portions (29% vs. 40%) of face-to-face class time.

Active Learning Improves Student Performance in a Respiratory Physiology Lab

“…Student perceptions of learning show significant positive response to the incorporation of active learning exercises (Berk et al, 2014;C. J. Miller & Metz, 2014;Wilke, 2003).…”

The Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Initiative: Early & Active Training for Physicians in the Genomic Medicine Era

“…Reported faculty barriers to adoption include lack of necessary class time, a high comfort level with traditional lectures, insufficient time to develop active learning materials and lack of control of the classroom [45,46]. Active learning methods have been shown to increase engagement, higher order learning and learning outcomes compared with the traditional lecture; however, it also decreases the amount of information delivery.…”

Creating Enabling Environment for Student Engagement: Faculty Practices of Critical Thinking

“…Studies reveal that most educators understand the importance of incorporating CT in their learners, but they are unable to do so during the given class duration, as they face dilemma of taking time away from content teaching and investing in use of ALS (Van Amburg et al, 2007, Zygmont & Schaeffer, 2006. Research findings report that limited time, lack of student interest, large class, and delivery of too much content in limited time are main barriers faculty encountered in implementation of ALS (Nabors, 2012;Michael, 2007;Miller & Metz, 2014).…”