2019
DOI: 10.1504/ijisd.2019.100377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of proactive and reactive environmental strategies in green product innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding the magnitude of green product innovation for organizations' sustainable growth and contribution to societal sustainability (Xie et al, 2019), how green product innovation can be facilitated by strategic postures of organizations has not been fully comprehended (Khan, Dhir, et al, 2021). The few studies in this stream have largely focused on the predictive role of general environmental strategies (Genc & Benedetto, 2019) or general sustainability orientation (Cheng, 2020). Recent academic attention has been drawn to a specific form of environmental strategy, namely green entrepreneurial orientation (green EO), defined as the extent to which an organization is strategically proactive, risk‐taking, and innovative in initiating and introducing green innovative products or services into the market (Luu, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding the magnitude of green product innovation for organizations' sustainable growth and contribution to societal sustainability (Xie et al, 2019), how green product innovation can be facilitated by strategic postures of organizations has not been fully comprehended (Khan, Dhir, et al, 2021). The few studies in this stream have largely focused on the predictive role of general environmental strategies (Genc & Benedetto, 2019) or general sustainability orientation (Cheng, 2020). Recent academic attention has been drawn to a specific form of environmental strategy, namely green entrepreneurial orientation (green EO), defined as the extent to which an organization is strategically proactive, risk‐taking, and innovative in initiating and introducing green innovative products or services into the market (Luu, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The European Commission [64] has described eco-innovation as "eco-innovation as any form of innovation resulting in or aiming at significant and demonstrable progress towards the goal of sustainable development, through reducing impacts on the environment, enhancing resilience to environmental pressures, or achieving a more efficient and responsible use of natural resources." However, Genç and Benedetto [6] and Blanco et al [30] show no direct association between companies' eco-friendly strategies and operating and financial performances. Similarly, Molina-Azorín et al [29], Son et al [31], and Hsiao and Wang [36] have established that a green environment and organizational performance have an indirect relationship.…”
Section: Eco-innovation As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, companies are also susceptible to environmental hazards due to social pressure and employing diverse initiatives to minimize these environmental hazards [4,5]. According to Genç and Benedetto [6] and Hart and Ahuja [7], the previous literature demonstrates the awareness and importance of environmental protection, and highlights several imperative variables for the companies' green environment. According to Vithessonthi [8] and Quazi et al [9], several pieces of research have advocated the prominence of distinctive determinants for proactive environmental Sustainability 2021, 13, 9479 2 of 26 strategies, for instance, planning and operating practices (POP) and communicational practices (CP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite this, as the pursuit of PES involves a huge amount of investment, other researchers have reservation about if this strategic pursuit would indeed dampen corporate profitability (e.g., Albertini, 2013; Genc & Benedetto, 2019; Kim, 2018). Among them, some have further subscribed to the “low hanging fruit principle” to argue that while corporate efforts to proactively prevent pollution would enable firms to enjoy initial cost savings from rectifying existing inefficiencies, such savings would become increasingly difficult to realize once the more obvious inefficiencies have been fixed (Ju et al, 2020).…”
Section: Conceptual Development and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%