2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-013-0333-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of primal- and dual-mixed finite element formulations for Timoshenko beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main goal of the present work is to perform analytical and numerical comparisons of different finite element formulations for cylindrical shells in the framework of the dimensionally reduced Naghdi shell model. The formulations investigated in this paper have much similarity and analogy to those presented for the Timoshenko beam in [17]. The strong and the (Galerkin-type) weak formulations of the governing equations for axisymmetric deformations are summarized in Section 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main goal of the present work is to perform analytical and numerical comparisons of different finite element formulations for cylindrical shells in the framework of the dimensionally reduced Naghdi shell model. The formulations investigated in this paper have much similarity and analogy to those presented for the Timoshenko beam in [17]. The strong and the (Galerkin-type) weak formulations of the governing equations for axisymmetric deformations are summarized in Section 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The difference in the membrane stiffness matrices has no significant effect on the performance of the elements, which is due to the coefficient h 2 /R 2 and to the fact, that in practical finite element computations the relation h R applies. The rather small difference in the shear parts results, however, in a dramatic change in the approximation properties of the elements for thin shell problems and, as is well known, the primal-mixed formulation leads to shear locking-free displacement computations, just like in the case of the Timoshenko beam element (see, e.g., [2,18] and [17]). Note that the primal-mixed element of Section 3.2 can also be obtained by the reduced integration technique applied in the standard displacement formulation.…”
Section: 51mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element formulations in elasticity provides wide strategies to tackle many kinds of problems, usually based on multi-field variational principles in the form of weightedresidual integrals as well as their weaken forms in which the mixing between these two strong and weak forms nowadays is often known as primal-mixed and Dual-mixed formulation. A valuable study of such topic is given in [23], in what follows the weak formulation will be followed.…”
Section: Mixed Finite Beam Element Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%