2013
DOI: 10.1093/deafed/ent030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Pragmatic Abilities of Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing and Their Hearing Peers

Abstract: Pragmatic skills are the key to a satisfying and sustained conversation. Such conversation is critical for the development of meaningful friendships. Previous studies have investigated the conversational skills of deaf children while interacting with adults or when interacting with peers in structured referential tasks. There are few published studies that have compared the pragmatic skills of children who are deaf or hard of hearing (D/HH) in free conversation with their hearing peers. In this study, the conv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess general language skill, we used the 22-item syntax ("Sentence Structure") subscale of the CELF (Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 1st ed.-preschool [CELF/P]: Wiig, Secord, & Semel, 1992). This test has been used effectively in prior ToM research with TD children (e.g., Ruffman, Slade, & Crowe, 2002) and with deaf children in the same age range as the present sample (e.g., Paatsch & Toe, 2014;Peterson, Wellman, & Slaughter, 2012). It assesses a broad range of developmentally sequenced lexical, morphological, and syntactic concepts via picturepointing responses and is uniquely suitable for validly assessing linguistic maturity among Auslan users (see Wellman & Peterson, 2013).…”
Section: Tasks and Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess general language skill, we used the 22-item syntax ("Sentence Structure") subscale of the CELF (Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 1st ed.-preschool [CELF/P]: Wiig, Secord, & Semel, 1992). This test has been used effectively in prior ToM research with TD children (e.g., Ruffman, Slade, & Crowe, 2002) and with deaf children in the same age range as the present sample (e.g., Paatsch & Toe, 2014;Peterson, Wellman, & Slaughter, 2012). It assesses a broad range of developmentally sequenced lexical, morphological, and syntactic concepts via picturepointing responses and is uniquely suitable for validly assessing linguistic maturity among Auslan users (see Wellman & Peterson, 2013).…”
Section: Tasks and Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deca sa oštećenjem sluha imaju neadekvatnu jezičku kompetenciju i produkciju (Dimić, 2004;Kašić i Dimić, 1999). Pač i saradnici smatraju da re/habilitacijski pristup kohlearno implantiranoj deci treba temeljiti na usvajanju pragmatike (Paatsch & Toe, 2014), jer ona ima pozitivan uticaj na razumevanje i upotrebu gramatičkih kategorija (Most, Shina-August & Meilijson, 2010). Ukoliko je re/habilitacioni tretman temeljno isplaniran i sproveden, deca sa kohlearnim implantom mogu pravilno da koriste glagolska vremena, ali sa zakašnjenjem u odnosu na čujuće vršnjake (Guo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Produkcija Osnovnih Glagolskih Vremena Dovodi Do Kvalitetnijunclassified
“…For this reason, group classes are organized with hearing-impaired children in order to support their academic needs, to promote the development of their language and communication skills, and to contribute to their learning of verbal language and vocabulary (Pakulski, 2011;Tannen, 2007). The literature also mentions that informal and formal (planned) one-to-one conversations are important for the development of verbal language and communications skills during the education of hearing-impaired children (Clarke & Stewart, 1986;Cole & Flexer, 2007;Kretschmer, 1994;Lloyd, Lieven & Arnold, 2001;Mahon, 2009;Paatsch & Toe, 2013). In a general sense of the term, formal conversation can be defined as the sharing of events, information, and meanings between the teacher and students, with the intention of forming an orally interactive environment (Clarke & Stewart, 1986;Kretschmer, 1994;Paatsch & Toe, 2013;Spencer & Marschark, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature also mentions that informal and formal (planned) one-to-one conversations are important for the development of verbal language and communications skills during the education of hearing-impaired children (Clarke & Stewart, 1986;Cole & Flexer, 2007;Kretschmer, 1994;Lloyd, Lieven & Arnold, 2001;Mahon, 2009;Paatsch & Toe, 2013). In a general sense of the term, formal conversation can be defined as the sharing of events, information, and meanings between the teacher and students, with the intention of forming an orally interactive environment (Clarke & Stewart, 1986;Kretschmer, 1994;Paatsch & Toe, 2013;Spencer & Marschark, 2006). Studies in the literature also mention that planned one-to-one conversations provide hearing-impaired children the opportunity to assume the role of both speaker and listener, and that such conversations contribute favourably to the development of their verbal language and communication skills (Clarke & Stewart, 1986;Cole & Flexer, 2007;Girgin, 2003;Kretschmer, 1994;Lloyd et al, 2001;Mahon, 2009;Paatsch & Toe, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%