2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1532313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of polarized double-zeta basis sets and natural orbitals for full configuration interaction benchmarks

Abstract: We compare several standard polarized double-zeta basis sets for use in full configuration interaction benchmark computations. The 6-31G**, DZP, cc-pVDZ, and Widmark-Malmqvist-Roos atomic natural orbital ͑ANO͒ basis sets are assessed on the basis of their ability to provide accurate full configuration interaction spectroscopic constants for several small molecules. Even though highly correlated methods work best with larger basis sets, predicted spectroscopic constants are in good agreement with experiment; bo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(21 reference statements)
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since their introduction in 1955, the NOs have been used extensively in CI calculations. [12][13][14][15][16] Several procedures of generating NOs have been exploited. Alternatively, one may use NOs to define an active space and include all the configurations ͑as specified by the correlation method͒ within this active space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their introduction in 1955, the NOs have been used extensively in CI calculations. [12][13][14][15][16] Several procedures of generating NOs have been exploited. Alternatively, one may use NOs to define an active space and include all the configurations ͑as specified by the correlation method͒ within this active space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39] b Ref. [39] are known to lead to significant errors, of ∼ 10 mE h , in the calculated fixed-node ground-state energy [40]. (This error is largely removed when multi-determinant trial wave functions are used to account for the near degeneracy.…”
Section: All-electron Total Ground-state Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimized SlaterJastrow trial wave functions with a single determinant (1) a Ref. [39] b Ref. [39] are known to lead to significant errors, of ∼ 10 mE h , in the calculated fixed-node ground-state energy [40].…”
Section: All-electron Total Ground-state Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can see it for some diatomics in the Table 2. Analogously, we can compare the APSGF results with reference full CI results with the same basis set 77. In some cases (BH, NH + ) the full CI calculated equilibrium distances are better, while in other cases (CH + , HF) the APSGF results are closer to the experimental ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%