2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of pig backfat measurements using ultrasonic and optical instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fabro et al (2013) and Serrano et al (2008) also found similar ADG for gilts at 166 and barrows at 145 kg final BW, whereas Peinado et al (2008) reported greater ADG for castrated males than intact females but no effect of sex on feed efficiency. In vivo carcass fat thickness was also found to be higher in barrows than in gilts by Morales et al (2011), whereas Magowan and McCann (2006) reported that gilts were fatter than boars when assessed for ultrasound backfat thickness.…”
Section: Growth Performance and Feed Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fabro et al (2013) and Serrano et al (2008) also found similar ADG for gilts at 166 and barrows at 145 kg final BW, whereas Peinado et al (2008) reported greater ADG for castrated males than intact females but no effect of sex on feed efficiency. In vivo carcass fat thickness was also found to be higher in barrows than in gilts by Morales et al (2011), whereas Magowan and McCann (2006) reported that gilts were fatter than boars when assessed for ultrasound backfat thickness.…”
Section: Growth Performance and Feed Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Surprisingly, in the current study, boars were fatter than gilts in the control group, which contradicts results from other studies. Gilts are usually fatter on normal diets (McPhee & Daniels, 1991;Nold et al, 1997;Beattie et al, 1999;Magowan & McCann, 2006). This may have been owing to lower slaughtering weights of pigs in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The full ultra sound was done, using digital PL-201V ultra sound diagnostic system (BMV Technology Co., Ltd, China). Back fat thickness was recorded according the method of Magowan and McCann, (2006). Reproductive performance during the farrowing period including litter size per head and number of still birth per head were determined according the procedure of Chusi et al (2016).…”
Section: Experimental Design and Sows Feeding Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%