2020
DOI: 10.3390/jmse8010021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Physical and Numerical Modeling of Homogenous Isotropic Propeller Blades

Abstract: Results of the fluid-structure co-simulations that were carried out as part of the FleksProp project are presented. The FleksProp project aims to establish better design procedures that take into account the hydroelastic behavior of marine propellers and thrusters. Part of the project is devoted to establishing good validation cases for fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations. More specifically, this paper describes the comparison of the numerical computations carried out on three propeller designs that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fatigue simulation, as well as the FE model are obtained using the in-house software GiD-PLCd [40]. The propeller geometry used is the propeller P1374, an open geometry for research purposes designed in Sintef Ocean, whose geometric parameters and description can be found in Amini and Steen [7], Savio [195], Savio et al [196]. The FE model consists of one propeller blade without hub.…”
Section: Propeller Geometry and Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The fatigue simulation, as well as the FE model are obtained using the in-house software GiD-PLCd [40]. The propeller geometry used is the propeller P1374, an open geometry for research purposes designed in Sintef Ocean, whose geometric parameters and description can be found in Amini and Steen [7], Savio [195], Savio et al [196]. The FE model consists of one propeller blade without hub.…”
Section: Propeller Geometry and Fe Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5.12 Comparison between the predicted deflections and the experimental deflections in a neat-resin blade. Experimental data obtained from Savio et al [196], for J = 0.4 and n = 11 rps.…”
Section: Verification Of Loading Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations