2017
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Photocatalytic Activities of Gold Nanoparticles Following Plasmonic and Interband Excitation and a Strategy for Harnessing Interband Hot Carriers for Solution Phase Photocatalysis

Abstract: Light driven excitation of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) has emerged as a potential strategy to generate hot carriers for photocatalysis through excitation of localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). In contrast, carrier generation through excitation of interband transitions remains a less explored and underestimated pathway for photocatalytic activity. Photoinduced oxidative etching of GNPs with FeCl3 was investigated as a model reaction in order to elucidate the effects of both types of transitions. The quant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

15
207
6
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(64 reference statements)
15
207
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At shorter l, the absorption was still high, owing to Cu interband transitions (21), but the reduction in E a was smaller, because the energetic electrons produced by interband transitions in Cu have substantially lower energies than those produced by plasmon decay (2). This is in contrast to recent observations that more, but less energetic, carriers generated by interband transitions in Au NPs were more efficient than those generated by plasmon resonant excitation in solution phase catalysis (22). In each case, however, the specific energetics of the reaction itself are likely to be very important in ultimately determining photocatalytic efficiencies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 80%
“…At shorter l, the absorption was still high, owing to Cu interband transitions (21), but the reduction in E a was smaller, because the energetic electrons produced by interband transitions in Cu have substantially lower energies than those produced by plasmon decay (2). This is in contrast to recent observations that more, but less energetic, carriers generated by interband transitions in Au NPs were more efficient than those generated by plasmon resonant excitation in solution phase catalysis (22). In each case, however, the specific energetics of the reaction itself are likely to be very important in ultimately determining photocatalytic efficiencies.…”
contrasting
confidence: 80%
“…When the excitation photon energy is above this threshold, interband transition will be induced, e.g. by electronic transition from 5d -band to 6sp -band in gold 13 15 . Such excitation definitely enhances electron density on the conduction band and will inevitably modulate the optical performance of the metallic nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the exact physical model for the process relating to the generation, transportation and injections of HCs needs to be built up. There are arguments that the dominating contributions of electrons (interband transitions with a relatively low energy of electrons or intraband transitions induced by SPs) from photoexcited metals is the improvement of catalytic reactivity, and some works have given different opinions [134,135]. The distinguishing of non-thermal effects (HCs effects) and thermal effects, which allows us to quantify each contribution for the enhancement of the process of photocatalysis, is also of great importance for designing specific structures with different purposes [136][137][138].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%