2001
DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp2303_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Personal Project Motives in Three Age Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed a confirmatory factor analysis to examine whether the employee measures were different constructs, because employee self‐reports are vulnerable to same source/common method bias (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003). The overall fit of the measurement model to the data was estimated with LISREL 8.80 (Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed a confirmatory factor analysis to examine whether the employee measures were different constructs, because employee self‐reports are vulnerable to same source/common method bias (Podsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003). The overall fit of the measurement model to the data was estimated with LISREL 8.80 (Jöreskog & Sörbom, 1996).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept places emphasis on the ecological aspects of undertaking personal projects, and uses each project as an interactional unit of analysis involving both personal and contextual dimensions (Little, 2000). This conceptualisation has been employed to assess person-environment relationships (Wallenius, 1999) and applied to studies involving older people (e.g., Lawton et al, 2002;Ogilvie et al, 2001).…”
Section: Measures and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Child goal content has also been shown to be age-related (Ogilvie, Rose, & Heppen, 2001), with leisure goals being a focus in early adolescence, with a later focus on school-based goals in the general population (Nurmi, Poole, & Kalakoski, 1994). This at UNSW Library on July 6, 2015 ccp.sagepub.com Downloaded from highlights the importance of open discussions, as part of which setting goals can be a valuable way to collaboratively gather further clinical information or to bring all parties more in alignment with what needs to be worked on (Emanuel, Catty, Anscombe, Cantle, & Muller, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%