A comparison of overlay routing and multihoming route control

AkellaAditya,; PangJeffrey,; MaggsBruce,; Seshan, Srinivasan; ShaikhAnees,

doi:10.1145/1030194.1015479

Cited by 50 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A comparison of Overlay Routing and Multihoming Route Control appears in [9]. In that study, the authors demonstrate that an intelligent control of BGP routes, coupled with ISP multihoming, can provide competitive end-to-end performance and reliability compared to overlay routing.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 98%

Leveraging Network Performances with IPv6 Multihoming and Multiple Provider-Dependent Aggregatable Prefixes

Launois

Quoitin

Bonaventure

2005

Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Multihoming, the practice of connecting to multiple providers, is becoming highly popular. Due to the growth of the BGP routing tables in the Internet, IPv6 multihoming is required to preserve the scalability of the interdomain routing system. A proposed method is to assign multiple provider-dependent aggregatable (PA) IPv6 prefixes to each site, instead of a single provider-independent (PI) prefix. We show that the use of multiple PA prefixes not only allows route aggregation but also can be used to reduce end-to-end delays by leveraging the Internet path diversity. We quantify the gain in path diversity, and show that a dualhomed stub AS that uses multiple PA prefixes has already a better Internet path diversity than any multihomed stub AS that uses a single PI prefix, whatever its number of providers. The benefits provided by the use of IPv6 multihoming with multiple PA prefixes are an opportunity to develop the support for quality of service and traffic engineering.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 98%

Leveraging Network Performances with IPv6 Multihoming and Multiple Provider-Dependent Aggregatable Prefixes

Launois

Quoitin

Bonaventure

2005

Quality of Service in Multiservice IP Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This method actually models IPv6 multihoming where the provider-dependent prefixes advertised by the virtual site are aggregated by its providers. A total of 13 multihomed sites are emulated by this method, a number similar to the study of Akella et al on multihoming [20]. In our study, 10 sites are dual-homed, 1 is 3-homed, 1 is 4-homed and a last one has 8 providers.…”

Section: Evaluation Of the Quality Of The Route Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In order to simulate IPv6 multihoming, we follow a similar methodology to the one used in [19,20]. We emulate a multihoming scenario by selecting a few RIPE nodes in the same metropolitan area, and use them collectively as a stand-in for a multihomed network.…”

Section: Evaluation Of the Quality Of The Route Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…RON nodes regularly monitor the quality of paths to each other, and use this information to dynamically select between the direct path and an indirect path via other RON nodes. However, it has been shown that the use of overlays is not necessary to achieve good end-to-end resilience and performance [20]. Our utilization of coordinate systems to select the routes relies on the existing BGP routes, and does not circumvent the BGP's policy-driven routing.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Scalable Route Selection for IPv6 Multihomed Sites

Launois

Uhlig

Bonaventure

2005

NETWORKING 2005. Networking Technologies, Services, and Protocols; Performance of Computer and Communication Networks; Mobile A

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. IPv6 multihoming with multiple prefixes increases the number of paths available between multihomed sites. Selecting the path with the lowest delay is important for many interactive and real-time applications. We propose in this paper to use a network coordinate system as a scalable an efficient way to help hosts in IPv6 multihomed sites in selecting the best source and destination IPv6 prefixes. Relying on RTT measurements from the RIPE NCC data set, our experiments show that, using synthetic coordinates, all paths with really bad delays can be avoided. Moreover, we are able to select paths with a delay at most 20% worse than the lowest delay for more than 85% of the pairs of multihomed sites. A second contribution is SVivaldi, an improved version of the Vivaldi distributed algorithm for computing synthetic coordinates. We show that SVivaldi produces more accurate coordinates and is able to stablilize Vivaldi's coordinates.

show abstract

“…The policy channel is then used to negotiate path switching through multihoming route control between the host and infrastructure tiers. [1] and [11] analyze the effectiveness of path-switching based on path properties in terms of path quality and path diversity (availability of alternate paths, low correlation of failure of alternate paths etc) over the actual topological diversity of the Internet. The results of the analysis establish that edge diversity through multihoming expose significant diversity in end-to-end Internet paths.…”

Section: The Global Routing Functionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Future Internet Architecture Based on De-Conflated Identities

Paul

Pan

Jain

2010

2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference GLOBECOM 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a new Internet architecture based on de-conflated identities (ADI) that explicitly establishes the separation of ownership of hosts from the underlying infrastructure connectivity. A direct impact of this de-conflated Internet architecture is the ability to express organizational policies separately and thus more naturally, from the underlying infrastructure routing policies. Host or organizational accountability is separated from the infrastructure accountability, laying the foundations of a cleaner security and policy enforcement framework. Also, it addresses the present Internet routing problems of mobility, multihoming, and traffic engineering more naturally by making a clear distinction of host and infrastructure responsibilities and thus defining these functions as a set of primitives governed by individual policies. In this paper, we instantiate the primitive mechanisms related to the issues of end-to-end policy enforcements, mobility, multihoming, traffic engineering, etc., within the context of our architecture to emphasize the relevance of a de-conflated Internet architecture on these functions.

show abstract

A comparison of overlay routing and multihoming route control

Cited by 50 publications

References 19 publications

Leveraging Network Performances with IPv6 Multihoming and Multiple Provider-Dependent Aggregatable Prefixes

Leveraging Network Performances with IPv6 Multihoming and Multiple Provider-Dependent Aggregatable Prefixes

Scalable Route Selection for IPv6 Multihomed Sites

A Future Internet Architecture Based on De-Conflated Identities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About