2021
DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000001029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Oral Health Outcomes of Self-Reported and Agency-Notified Child Maltreatment in a Population-Based Birth Cohort at 30-Year-Old Follow-Up

Abstract: Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This involved selecting the highest level of maltreatment scored on either the physical or emotional neglect sub-scales Both the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests indicated that none of the scores showed a normal distribution ( p < 0.0001). In common with previous work on other outcomes in the same cohort, the continuous scores from the subscales were therefore divided into “none/low” and “moderate/severe” but sensitivity analyses were also performed of the effect of splitting the scores into “severe” versus all other categories (Kisely, Abajobir, et al, 2020; Kisely et al, 2021; Kisely et al, 2021b; Kisely et al, 2022; Najman et al, 2020). In particular, this approach was used in our comparison between self-reported and agency reported maltreatment in the same birth cohort, on which the CTQ designer was a co-author (Najman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involved selecting the highest level of maltreatment scored on either the physical or emotional neglect sub-scales Both the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests indicated that none of the scores showed a normal distribution ( p < 0.0001). In common with previous work on other outcomes in the same cohort, the continuous scores from the subscales were therefore divided into “none/low” and “moderate/severe” but sensitivity analyses were also performed of the effect of splitting the scores into “severe” versus all other categories (Kisely, Abajobir, et al, 2020; Kisely et al, 2021; Kisely et al, 2021b; Kisely et al, 2022; Najman et al, 2020). In particular, this approach was used in our comparison between self-reported and agency reported maltreatment in the same birth cohort, on which the CTQ designer was a co-author (Najman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We speci cally assessed the oral health symptoms of an individual, ETS frequencies, socioeconomic status, and health behavior covariates based on self-reported data. This nding may have been subject to recall bias [27]. Hence, the data may not have been accurately measured and may not be reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We specifically assessed the oral health symptoms of an individual, ETS frequencies, socioeconomic status, and health behavior covariates based on self-reported data. This finding may have been subject to recall bias [ 36 ]. Hence, the data may not have been accurately measured and may not be reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%