2004
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00080.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of oligonucleotide and cDNA-based microarray systems

Abstract: A comparison of oligonucleotide and cDNA-based microarray systems. Physiol Genomics 16: 361-370, 2004. First published November 25, 2003 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00080.2003.-Large-scale public data mining will become more common as public release of microarray data sets becomes a corequisite for publication. Therefore, there is an urgent need to clarify whether data from different microarray platforms are comparable. To assess the compatibility of microarray data, results were compared from the two main types o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the IFM signature is based on a custom cDNA-based gene expression platform, rather than the Affymetrix GeneChips, which have become common for MM GEP studies. 32 The cDNA platforms have been reported to be difficult to compare with the Affymetrix oligonucleotide platform. 12 Although the MILLENNIUM signature was generated using Affymetrix GeneChips, the use of an earlier version of this platform may have contributed to the limited performance of this signature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the IFM signature is based on a custom cDNA-based gene expression platform, rather than the Affymetrix GeneChips, which have become common for MM GEP studies. 32 The cDNA platforms have been reported to be difficult to compare with the Affymetrix oligonucleotide platform. 12 Although the MILLENNIUM signature was generated using Affymetrix GeneChips, the use of an earlier version of this platform may have contributed to the limited performance of this signature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biopsies were taken endoscopically from a defined area of the colon and immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted and processed as previously described (Mah et al 2004) and quality controlled using an Agilent Bioanalyzer according to the manufacturer's guidelines. DNA was extracted from biopsies using the QIAamp Tissue DNA preparation kit (Qiagen).…”
Section: Biopsy Processing and Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, labelling, hybridisation and processing of Affymetrix GeneChip arrays is highly automated, thereby producing very reproducible results, whereas cDNA arrays are less automated and therefore likely to be less reproducible. In addition, GeneChips have been shown to be more specific and have a greater dynamic range than cDNA arrays (Mah et al, 2004;Woo et al, 2004) and there are numerous publically available data sets for human GeneChips that could be directly compared with experiments performed using this technique. This method will allow transcriptome analysis of developmental and metabolic processes, as well as disease responses, in sheep and possibly other species for which specific microarrays are not available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%