2008
DOI: 10.1002/qj.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of numerical solutions to the Eady frontogenesis problem

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The semi-geostrophic solution to the Eady frontogenesis problem is believed to represent an asymptotic limit of the full Euler equations as the Rossby number tends to zero. This is investigated using numerical solutions. The exercise is non-trivial because the semi-geostrophic solution is discontinuous, and so may not be found as the limit of the Eulerian form of the equations. It is shown that solutions of the two-dimensional compressible Euler equations converge to a singular limit with geostrophic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Behind the forced frontal updraught and above the frontal surface, alternate regions of descent and ascent are evident, suggestive of a gravity wave propagating vertically away from the surface front, which acts to distort the isentropes above and behind the surface front. Similar gravity‐wave‐like structures were found by Cullen () in two‐dimensional simulations of the Eady frontogenesis problem and by Muir and Reeder () in a high‐resolution, two‐dimensional simulation of an idealized front. Overall, the structure of the noBL front is in agreement with previous idealized experiments; the absence of a PBL scheme results in unrealistically strong surface potential temperature gradients, limited convergence and hence unrealistically weak vertical motion.…”
Section: Structure and Evolution Of Cold Frontssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Behind the forced frontal updraught and above the frontal surface, alternate regions of descent and ascent are evident, suggestive of a gravity wave propagating vertically away from the surface front, which acts to distort the isentropes above and behind the surface front. Similar gravity‐wave‐like structures were found by Cullen () in two‐dimensional simulations of the Eady frontogenesis problem and by Muir and Reeder () in a high‐resolution, two‐dimensional simulation of an idealized front. Overall, the structure of the noBL front is in agreement with previous idealized experiments; the absence of a PBL scheme results in unrealistically strong surface potential temperature gradients, limited convergence and hence unrealistically weak vertical motion.…”
Section: Structure and Evolution Of Cold Frontssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A numerical model should not generate excessive imbalance, and, ideally, should not require artificial damping mechanisms to control imbalance. A thorough investigation of this issue requires an examination of how the model performs in the asymptotic limits of small Rossby or Froude number (Cullen, 2007(Cullen, , 2008; this is the subject of ongoing work. For present purposes we examine some simple diagnostics of imbalance in the barotropic instability test case, applied to the mimetic finite volume model and, for comparison, to ENDGame.…”
Section: Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above the boundary layer, the second‐order approximation of the material derivative dominated below Ro = 0.1. The second‐order convergence rate was in agreement with that found for the dynamics‐only SG case during the early phases of baroclinic development (Cullen, ). These findings were in agreement with the estimates made in Eqs and .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our new test involved running HPE models at the small‐ Ro limit, and comparing with a balanced model that included a boundary layer: the SGT model. Previous work focused on the convergence of the HPE solutions to SG solutions for the dynamics‐only case (Cullen, ; Visram et al ). For the first time, we determined the role of the boundary‐layer parametrization in modifying the dynamics‐only results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation