A comparison of North American and European railway systems

Abstract

In comparison to North America, railway companies in Europe are confronted with strong economic issues in running their wagonload traffic. The purpose of this paper is an analysis how infrastructural and institutional differences affect planning issues and economic efficiency. Method A particular decision problem from railway freight traffic, the Railroad Blocking Problem (RBP), is considered. It is a typical consolidation problem from wagonload traffic, where transport and reclassification costs have to be balanced. A short survey on corresponding optimization models is given. An analysis of the cost structures shows that the share of fix costs in the total transport costs is much higher in Europe than in North America. The objective functions of the models take this into account. They effect that North American models mainly focus on finding short ways for each wagon, while European ones focus on consolidation and high train utilization. The possibility to transfer North American planning concepts to Europe is discussed. Results Due to institutional and infrastructural reasons, train capacities and cost structures in North American and European railway freight traffic differ from each other. This results in very centralized railway traffic in Europe. According to the different circumstances, the planning issues differ

Improvement of efficiency in the organization of transfer trains at developed railway nodes by implementing a "flexible model"

“…Article [11] analyzed the impact of systemic differences in railroad transport between North America and Europe, and provided a brief overview of relevant optimization models. Compared with North America, railroad companies in Europe faced serious economic problems in handling freight flows.…”

The train marshalling by a single shunting engine problem

“…The main reasons are highly uncertain arrival times of inbound trains and the unfavourable ratio of number of blocks to number of classification tracks due to certain characteristics of the European railway system. Clausen et al elaborate on these characteristics and their implications in great detail in their contribution (Clausen and Voll, 2013). These uncertain arrival times in combination with limited track capacity in the RY force shunting yard operators to utilise the hump at its capacity limit in order to guarantee the availability of receiving tracks for incoming trains.…”

System analysis of a high-speed freight train terminal

“…generally offers shorter transit and lead times, greater flexibility and often lower costs [9]. To increase the share of freight transport on rail the competitiveness of the SWL needs to be improved [10]. This requires new concepts that enable competitive shipment of LDHV goods for rail freight transport [11].…”