2008
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2008.11076770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Muscular Activity Involved in the Use of Two Different Types of Computer Mouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, several studies have shown that placement of the mouse closer to the center line of the operator reduces non-neutral shoulder and wrist postures as well as reducing muscle activity of both the forearm and the shoulder (Sommerich et al, 2002;Dennerlein, 2006;Kumar andKumar, 2008, Harvey, 1997). Other studies have shown that the design of the pointing device has little effect on neck and shoulder posture and muscle activity; however, they do have an effect on forearm muscle activity (Lee, 2005(Lee, , 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For instance, several studies have shown that placement of the mouse closer to the center line of the operator reduces non-neutral shoulder and wrist postures as well as reducing muscle activity of both the forearm and the shoulder (Sommerich et al, 2002;Dennerlein, 2006;Kumar andKumar, 2008, Harvey, 1997). Other studies have shown that the design of the pointing device has little effect on neck and shoulder posture and muscle activity; however, they do have an effect on forearm muscle activity (Lee, 2005(Lee, , 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Zhu and Shin [55] in an experimental study among 24 participants found that arms resting at elbow level height produced lowest muscle amplitude activity. In other studies, researchers found muscle activities on the shoulders are lower when the upper arms are positioned at the side of the torso instead of being abducted to the side [56], [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This task included clicking on 20 squares that were arranged in numbers in two rows of 10. For each mouse, this task was performed by each subject for 5 minutes to record EMG data [11].…”
Section: The Standard Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%