2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0553-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of motor stimulation threshold in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our data show that performing three different methods of nerve localisation does not require a significant additional time and, definitely, it does not delay surgery. Not by chance, the block execution time was similar to the one showed by other studies without the use of triple monitoring [13,20], while the block onset time was consistent with the one found in other experiences using similar dosage of local anaesthetic [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, our data show that performing three different methods of nerve localisation does not require a significant additional time and, definitely, it does not delay surgery. Not by chance, the block execution time was similar to the one showed by other studies without the use of triple monitoring [13,20], while the block onset time was consistent with the one found in other experiences using similar dosage of local anaesthetic [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this way, it was possible to control in real time the needle tip which was placed between C5 and C6 brachial plexus roots (Figure 3). With the needle tip in place, the second control was performed through NS, verifying the absence of a motor response at a stimulation intensity ≤ 0.5 mA; in case of a motor response, the needle tip was repositioned under ultrasound guidance [13,14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After confirming that the aspiration test was negative, 10 mg of the study drug were injected. Then the needle was repositioned in the neural cluster; once a threshold current less than 0.5 mA 14 was confirmed, the remaining 15.1 ml of the study drug were injected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After sterile skin preparation with a solution of chlorhexidine 2% in isopropyl alcohol 70% and skin infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, a sterile 50-mm, 22-gauge insulated nerve-stimulating needle (PAJUNK, Geisingen, Germany) was inserted in-plane technique until the needle tip was adjacent to the C5 and C6 roots under ultrasound guidance (Export; SonoSite, Bothell, Washington), and appropriate needle position was confirmed at a threshold current less than 0.5 mA. 15 After negative aspiration test for blood, 15 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine (epinephrine 1:200,000) was injected. After ISBPB, sensory block was assessed every 5 minutes for 30 minutes by pinprick test in the corresponding C5 and C6 sensory dermatome distribution.…”
Section: Isbpb Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%