2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of monthly global indicators for forecasting growth

Abstract: for many useful suggestions. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, IMF management, or the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, our study contributes to the scarce but rapidly growing body of work on modelling economic growth in a mixed-frequency context (see, Baumeister & Guérin, 2021;Clements & Galvão, 2008;Enilov & Wang, 2022;Ferrara & Marsilli, 2019;Liu & Song, 2018). The advantage of this mixed-frequency approach is in its explicit dealing with the issue of temporal aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Third, our study contributes to the scarce but rapidly growing body of work on modelling economic growth in a mixed-frequency context (see, Baumeister & Guérin, 2021;Clements & Galvão, 2008;Enilov & Wang, 2022;Ferrara & Marsilli, 2019;Liu & Song, 2018). The advantage of this mixed-frequency approach is in its explicit dealing with the issue of temporal aggregation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…More specifically, we consider the real productivity growth (RPOD), the growth in car registrations (CREG), the rate of unemployment (UNEM), the consumer inflation rate (Consumer Price Index [CPI]), the producer inflation rate (Producer Price Index [PPI]), the growth in construction production (Construction Volume Index of Production [CONPROD]), long‐term interest rates (LONGR), equity market returns (STOCK), and the change in the OECD Leading Indicator (LEAD). Similar factors have been employed in various business cycle‐related studies: Baumeister and Guérin (2021), Berger et al (2023), Cimadomo et al (2022), and Morley and Wong (2020). Table A1 reports the ultimate set of factors, as well as their corresponding transformations, that is, the underlying series are transformed by either taking differences in the natural logarithms ( normalΔln) or the first difference ( normalΔlv) to achieve stationarity.…”
Section: Data and Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, other nine country-specific explanatory variables are taken into account, i.e., real productivity, car registrations, the consumer inflation rate, the producer inflation rate, the construction production index, long interest rates, equity market returns, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) leading indicator. Thus, the set of country-specific covariates contains macroeconomic and financial-marketrelated indicators, the majority of which are widely followed by both policymakers and practitioners, and have been used in the existing literature, see, for example, Morley and Wong (2020), Baumeister and Guérin (2021), Chudik et al (2021), Cimadomo et al (2022), Berger et al (2023), and Vrontos et al (2024). The list of predictor variables/factors and their transformations to achieve stationarity are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%