2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8141(01)00095-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of microstructural and chemical patterns in garnet from the Fleur de Lys Supergroup, Newfoundland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that Type I zircon grew at 465 ± 12 Ma on the M 1 retrograde path during garnet break down following eclogite-facies metamorphism. This is consistent with the interpretation of Stallard and Hickey (2002) that the first stage of garnet growth (their G1) in the Fleur de Lys Supergroup ceased and garnet consumption began following the Early Ordovician Taconic metamorphism. The flat HREE patterns of Type II zircon resemble the compositional profiles for zircon that formed either synor post-garnet growth.…”
Section: U-pb Age and Trace Element Geochemistrysupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We propose that Type I zircon grew at 465 ± 12 Ma on the M 1 retrograde path during garnet break down following eclogite-facies metamorphism. This is consistent with the interpretation of Stallard and Hickey (2002) that the first stage of garnet growth (their G1) in the Fleur de Lys Supergroup ceased and garnet consumption began following the Early Ordovician Taconic metamorphism. The flat HREE patterns of Type II zircon resemble the compositional profiles for zircon that formed either synor post-garnet growth.…”
Section: U-pb Age and Trace Element Geochemistrysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These low U zircon grains and narrow overgrowths could not be dated. We tentatively interpret that they crystallized during Salinic M 2 metamorphism when growth of new garnet phases resumed (analogous to the G2 to G4 garnet growth phases of Stallard and Hickey 2002) under amphibolite-facies conditions. (Cawood et al 1994) despite the structural, petrological and sedimentological evidence for Ordovician Taconic tectonism (e.g.…”
Section: U-pb Age and Trace Element Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Garnet porphyroblasts in metamorphic rocks provide valuable information on the processes of crystal nucleation and growth for two reasons (Miyashita, 1996): (1) they usually contain internal textural zones and inclusion trails that aid in correlating the timing of garnet growth under specific conditions with deformation and metamorphism (e.g., Hollister, 1966;Andersen, 1984;Rice and Mitchell, 1991;Williams, 1994;Bell et al, 1997;Stallard and Hickey, 2002;Meth and Carlson, 2005;Kim and Jung, 2010;Kiers, 2013), and (2) they have distinct chemical zoning retaining a record of their growth history (e.g., Olimpio and Anderson, 1978;Takasu, 1986;Stallard and Hickey, 2002;Meth and Carlson, 2005;Stowell et al, 2011) and showing some of the greatest variability in terms of solid solution, providing data to constrain the P-T-t evolution of metamorphism in orogenic belts (e.g., Florence and Spear, 1993;Ratner and Cheney, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spear & Daniel, 2001; Yang & Rivers, 2001; Ikeda et al. , 2002; Stallard & Hickey, 2002). Thus, zoning patterns of major and trace elements in garnet allow us to understand transport processes during the growth of garnet, although the transport of aluminium is generally regarded as the rate‐limiting factor in garnet crystallization because of slow diffusion rate and low solubility in metamorphic fluid (Anderson et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%