2012
DOI: 10.5735/086.049.0506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Microscopy and PCR Diagnostics for Low Intensity Infections of Haemosporidian Parasites in the Siberian TitPoecile cinctus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, due to the above-mentioned abortive development, gametocytes could be missing in blood. Krams et al (2012) reported significantly higher prevalence of Haemoproteus spp. when using molecular methods in comparison with microscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Additionally, due to the above-mentioned abortive development, gametocytes could be missing in blood. Krams et al (2012) reported significantly higher prevalence of Haemoproteus spp. when using molecular methods in comparison with microscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It has been suggested that PCR-based molecular methods would be more sensitive than microscopy to detection of chronic blood parasite infections (Richard et al 2002, Krams et al 2012. Therefore, we are aware that Haemoproteus infection could be difficult to detect by microscopic scans of blood smears when it became chronic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that when either technique showed a positive infection, we regarded this avian host as infected. If we detected an infection only through PCR, we assumed a very low parasitemia (a parasite count of 1) not detected by using the microscope [70]. However, in such cases we repeated each PCR at least two times to avoid false positives.…”
Section: Hematological Parameters (Parasite Prevalence Parasitemia mentioning
confidence: 99%