Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Methods to Detect and Quantify the Markers of Antimalarial Drug Resistance

Abstract: We compare, contrast, and evaluate methods to quantify genetic markers of antimalarial drug resistance. Frequency estimates should be reported along with crude prevalence. There are four main potential methods to estimate frequencies in blood samples: simple counting of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes in samples with multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 1; SNP counting in samples with MOI ≤ 2; SNP and haplotypes counting in samples with unambiguous genotypes; statistical inference using SNP … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using prevalence data, various counting strategies have been used to estimate the frequency of the marker in the parasite population [22,23]. To assess these approaches, the frequency estimates from the statistical model were compared with those from commonly used counting methods using the data from Uganda (see Section 3, Additional file 2 for full details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using prevalence data, various counting strategies have been used to estimate the frequency of the marker in the parasite population [22,23]. To assess these approaches, the frequency estimates from the statistical model were compared with those from commonly used counting methods using the data from Uganda (see Section 3, Additional file 2 for full details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional counting methods to estimate gene frequency also exist [22,23]. These include discarding all discernibly multiclonal blood samples, which can lead to large losses of data; or discounting minority alleles at mixed SNPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(g) Frequency of resistance We employ two measures of the frequency of resistance in complex infections: (i) the fraction of the population that is infected by at least one resistant strain, 1 À P i X i;0 ; and (ii) the fraction of the parasite load that is resistant, P ij j=ði þ jÞX i ; j: The former is important because it tracks nearly exactly with the frequency that a treated clinical infection is resistant, which is the measure by which resistance is often tracked in a population [45,46]. On the other hand, the latter is particularly useful when discussing the role that asymptomatic infections play in the spread of resistance.…”
Section: (E) Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these limitations, it has not been possible to study within-host evolution of human malaria parasites by using these methods. To study the competition and selection between variants in a mixed malaria infection, new tools are required that are sensitive to minority populations and quantitative for relative parasite population sizes in the host (17). Nextgeneration sequencing techniques, such as massively parallel pyrosequencing (MPP), provide the increased resolution of in-host diversity necessary for more thorough ecological studies of inhost selection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%