2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of methods for separation of transient and oscillatory signals in EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another promising venue is to investigate high frequency oscillations (Epstein et al , 2014). Such high frequencies have been shown to be a good marker of the epileptogenic zone (Urrestarazu et al , 2007), but require careful handling of the frequency overlap between epileptic spikes and oscillations (Bénar et al , 2010, Jmail et al , 2011. Further work is needed to test the impact of these methodological choices.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another promising venue is to investigate high frequency oscillations (Epstein et al , 2014). Such high frequencies have been shown to be a good marker of the epileptogenic zone (Urrestarazu et al , 2007), but require careful handling of the frequency overlap between epileptic spikes and oscillations (Bénar et al , 2010, Jmail et al , 2011. Further work is needed to test the impact of these methodological choices.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the decomposition is adapted to the dataset and hence only extracts features representing common waveforms reflecting pain-specific information [13]. Secondly, the decomposition does not require any a priori choice of the best matched filter for decomposition into a filter bank by either a finite impulse response filter or wavelet transform [32]. Third, the decomposition into atoms described in both time and frequency bridges the gap between feature extraction based on a pure frequency analysis, where the time information is discarded, and feature extraction based on time-frequency coefficients, where minor fluctuations in peak latencies may influence the classification accuracy due to phase variability between the sweeps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected oscillations that were temporally separated from spikes in order to avoid spurious oscillations by filtering transient signals (Bénar et al 2010). Sections of 300 ms were created around each spike or oscillation (Jmail et al 2011). Oscillations in the 15-45 Hz band were marked on MEG and IEEG by visual inspection.…”
Section: Detection Of Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We concatenated separately the time windows containing spikes and oscillations and applied FIR filtering on the (Jmail et al 2011). For spikes, a band-pass filter was applied between 10 and 45 Hz in order to eliminate the following slow component.…”
Section: Band Pass Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation