2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abe553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparison of methods for fully automatic segmentation of tumors and involved nodes in PET/CT of head and neck cancers

Abstract: Target volume delineation is a vital but time-consuming and challenging part of radiotherapy, where the goal is to deliver sufficient dose to the target while reducing risks of side effects. For head and neck cancer (HNC) this is complicated by the complex anatomy of the head and neck region and the proximity of target volumes to organs at risk. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate conventional PET thresholding methods, six classical machine learning algorithms and a 2D U-Net convolutional neu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, with this relatively small number of PET/CT images with heterogeneous tumor FDG uptake, we still achieved higher segmentation performance than in previous studies. [12][13][14][15] Second, our PET/CT images were from a specific series of PET/CT scanners in a single institution, which could hamper the generalizability of our results. The semiquantitative metabolic parameters are affected by scanner model and reconstruction protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, with this relatively small number of PET/CT images with heterogeneous tumor FDG uptake, we still achieved higher segmentation performance than in previous studies. [12][13][14][15] Second, our PET/CT images were from a specific series of PET/CT scanners in a single institution, which could hamper the generalizability of our results. The semiquantitative metabolic parameters are affected by scanner model and reconstruction protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the rst study to report automated hepatic lesion detection using deep learning in 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET. Hepatic lesion detectability is an especially di cult task in 68 Ga-DOTATATE imaging because of higher normal background liver activity [5,25], and high variability of uptake compared to normal hepatic FDG uptake [25][26][27][28]. Prior studies of 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET have con rmed that detectability is not only dependent on tumor uptake, but it is also highly dependent upon the normal background, and the background image noise [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The union of both manual contours was used as ground truth. The features were arranged in a data matrix as described in [29] and [30] and illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%